Skip to comments.
Retread ZOT! Who is the moderator in this thread?
Posted on 02/27/2007 4:07:28 PM PST by PATRICKHENRY REPUBLIC
I would like to get permission to post a question to other Freepers. TY.
TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Free Republic Policy/Q&A
KEYWORDS: aaaaaaaaazotzzzzzzzz; aaaaaaaazzzaaaaaaaaa; allurzotarbelong2us; areyoueponymous; dntfearbutembracezot; donotadjustvertical; dontadjusthorizontal; fan; ibtz; idesofmarchareuponus; iluvcatapungeeweeeee; lifestooshorttofight; middlefingerdiscount; molassesmiasma; monkeyfacerules; monkeyfacewhatrules; patrickhenryzot; penguinhumor; pleasedontzottheut; remainclamplease; remnantcuriosbite; sionnsar; thisisnotanotzot; thompsonforpresident; troll; trollpavedover; trolltimer; u4goturkeywurdz; vikingkitties; vk; weareincontrol; wehavearrived; wherewegoingbob; youneedbifocals; zombiethread; zot; zotisyourbuddy; zotisyourchum; zotisyourfriend; zotisyourpal; zotuntilwedrop; zotzapalooza
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 3,261-3,280, 3,281-3,300, 3,301-3,320 ... 3,721-3,733 next last
To: Jet Jaguar
I have had occasions when I could have fought.
I managed to avoid that necessity. At the time, I thought that was efficient.
I know the principles, and when to apply them. I'm just not sure how efficient I might be about it.
I'm also not entirely sure what Heinlein meant by fighting efficiently. One of his principle fighting men won his battle by dismantling atomic weapons, (at the cost of his own life).
But his actions saved many lives, and ended an unjustified insurrection.
Pretty efficient, actually.
As to conning a ship: Again, I know the principles, but aside from the Flying Castle, I have never been entrusted with more than a rowboat.
Dying gallantly often comes easier than one might expect. Those people on Flight 93 didn't plan to do so, but it usually doesn't involve planning anyway.
Anyone who has taken the oath to defend the Constitution knows what may someday be asked of him or her. They take the oath anyway. I did, and no one has said I am relieved of its responsibility yet.
3,281
posted on
03/26/2007 5:17:36 PM PDT
by
NicknamedBob
(I know where I have gone wrong, and I can cite it, chapter and verse.)
To: tuliptree76
LOL! Hopefully it will be transporting the drafts to the recycling center in the near future. Although, the drafts would make a nice bonfire for a marshmallow roast. :-) Burning them would loft some more CO2 into the atmosphere so we won't go into an ice age.
3,282
posted on
03/26/2007 5:18:46 PM PDT
by
sionnsar
(?trad-anglican.faithweb.com?|Iran Azadi| 5yst3m 0wn3d - it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY) | UN: Useless Nations)
To: Harmless Teddy Bear
Congratulations!
Evening Ladies, Gentlemen and K'niggets of the Flying Castle:
Didn't know we had any Evening Ladies aboard the Flying Castle, though... *\;-)
3,283
posted on
03/26/2007 5:21:49 PM PDT
by
sionnsar
(?trad-anglican.faithweb.com?|Iran Azadi| 5yst3m 0wn3d - it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY) | UN: Useless Nations)
To: NicknamedBob
die gallantly not yet Hm. Not able to die gallantly yet? Suggest you put it off for a while then, NnBob! *\;-)
3,284
posted on
03/26/2007 5:25:50 PM PDT
by
sionnsar
(?trad-anglican.faithweb.com?|Iran Azadi| 5yst3m 0wn3d - it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY) | UN: Useless Nations)
To: NicknamedBob
As to conning a ship Conning a ship isn't hard. They're really not very bright, you know, and quite gullible -- it's getting their attention to begin with that's difficult.
3,285
posted on
03/26/2007 5:29:31 PM PDT
by
sionnsar
(?trad-anglican.faithweb.com?|Iran Azadi| 5yst3m 0wn3d - it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY) | UN: Useless Nations)
To: sionnsar
3,286
posted on
03/26/2007 5:34:44 PM PDT
by
sionnsar
(?trad-anglican.faithweb.com?|Iran Azadi| 5yst3m 0wn3d - it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY) | UN: Useless Nations)
To: sionnsar
I died fictionally, but it wasn't particularly gallant.
Fictional gallantry is easy to summon.
3,287
posted on
03/26/2007 5:46:49 PM PDT
by
NicknamedBob
(I know where I have gone wrong, and I can cite it, chapter and verse.)
To: Harmless Teddy Bear
Congrats, HTB! That's a good reason to be offline. :-)
3,288
posted on
03/26/2007 5:47:59 PM PDT
by
Not A Snowbird
(I made it home! Hello, Seattle! It's Raining! Woo Hoo!)
To: sionnsar
"Didn't know we had any Evening Ladies aboard the Flying Castle, though... " I take it you haven't sampled all of the distractions and delights of the "Are We There Yet?"
3,289
posted on
03/26/2007 5:50:03 PM PDT
by
NicknamedBob
(I know where I have gone wrong, and I can cite it, chapter and verse.)
To: NicknamedBob
It would appear not. ? *\:-|
3,290
posted on
03/26/2007 5:53:49 PM PDT
by
sionnsar
(?trad-anglican.faithweb.com?|Iran Azadi| 5yst3m 0wn3d - it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY) | UN: Useless Nations)
To: NicknamedBob
It would appear not. ? *\:-|
3,291
posted on
03/26/2007 5:54:38 PM PDT
by
sionnsar
(?trad-anglican.faithweb.com?|Iran Azadi| 5yst3m 0wn3d - it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY) | UN: Useless Nations)
To: NicknamedBob
Oh...
3,292
posted on
03/26/2007 5:55:40 PM PDT
by
sionnsar
(?trad-anglican.faithweb.com?|Iran Azadi| 5yst3m 0wn3d - it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY) | UN: Useless Nations)
To: sionnsar
Believe it or not, they've managed to come up with a sushi restaurant there.
I'd have better information if we were organized.
3,293
posted on
03/26/2007 5:57:18 PM PDT
by
NicknamedBob
(I know where I have gone wrong, and I can cite it, chapter and verse.)
To: NicknamedBob
Ummm... it's not all that late (but it has been a long, hard day) -- you lost me.
3,294
posted on
03/26/2007 6:22:37 PM PDT
by
sionnsar
(?trad-anglican.faithweb.com?|Iran Azadi| 5yst3m 0wn3d - it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY) | UN: Useless Nations)
To: NicknamedBob
Bussard explains that once fusion occurs, the reaction kicks the reaction particles out of the chamber with tremendous force, but that force can be captured electromagnetically, making the reactor a super-efficient electricity generator. That's the problem though, isn't it. In order to "trap" the particles, you'd need a darn strong field. You'd never get over unity going that route. Your containment vessel, even just a magnetic one, would need to be stronger than your reaction output. More energy pushing out than you've got holding in and you'd lose containment.
That ain't a good thing.
Our GCNR rockets are similar in principle, without the fusion. Reaction mass heat accelerates a particle out the ass end. Ship goes other way. Magnetic containment is just a part of it for sideband shielding and cost savings. Waste heat electrical generation ensures higher efficiency, but not over unity.
There is a better way to do fusion, we just haven't figured out how to do it yet. If we get to a point where we can convert say heat, directly into gravity... then we'll be on the right track. Until then, it's all smoke, mirrors, and tax money...
3,295
posted on
03/26/2007 6:25:40 PM PDT
by
Dead Corpse
(What would a free man do?)
To: NicknamedBob
Comfort the dying and Die Gallantly. Only two I haven't done yet. Hopefully, not for a while either...
Of course, the "ship" was a pontoon boat and the building was a layout for a possible housing style we are looking at. But I'm going to count 'em anyway... ;-)
3,296
posted on
03/26/2007 6:27:32 PM PDT
by
Dead Corpse
(What would a free man do?)
To: Dead Corpse; NicknamedBob
Bussard explains that once fusion occurs, the reaction kicks the reaction particles out of the chamber with tremendous force, but that force can be captured electromagnetically, making the reactor a super-efficient electricity generator. Ummm... doesn't that electromagnetic capture somewhat distort the "shape" of the vessel, reducing its efficiency? (Just a question...)
3,297
posted on
03/26/2007 6:38:37 PM PDT
by
sionnsar
(?trad-anglican.faithweb.com?|Iran Azadi| 5yst3m 0wn3d - it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY) | UN: Useless Nations)
To: Dead Corpse
Comfort the dying and Die Gallantly. Only two I haven't done yet. Tried both. Failed at the latter only (I think) because I'm still alive, but if I'd gone it might have been considered gallant. By a few. Whatever the circumstances.
No desire to walk that road again, but if I have to... I've been there.
3,298
posted on
03/26/2007 6:46:55 PM PDT
by
sionnsar
(?trad-anglican.faithweb.com?|Iran Azadi| 5yst3m 0wn3d - it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY) | UN: Useless Nations)
To: Dead Corpse
"In order to "trap" the particles, you'd need a darn strong field." There is no reason to continue containing particles which have already fused.
The remarkable thing about Bussard's work, aside from the disappointingly long time they took doing it, is the small scale of his devices.
I am interested in seeing what full scale devices would do. Bussard says they scale as the seventh power.
While there may be unforeseen complications, they have done most of the basic research. It really is time to go full scale and see what happens.
I don't want to see any more tax money go to build these things either, but I would like to see some investment capital take a risk. The reward would be "astronomical".
3,299
posted on
03/26/2007 6:57:08 PM PDT
by
NicknamedBob
(I know where I have gone wrong, and I can cite it, chapter and verse.)
To: sionnsar
Ummm... doesn't that electromagnetic capture somewhat distort the "shape" of the vessel, reducing its efficiency? (Just a question...) It could. Same way solar radiation pops out flares along lines of magnetic force. If one of those happens to intersect say, a super conductive magnet, Viola!! Your head, e'splode!
3,300
posted on
03/26/2007 6:58:09 PM PDT
by
Dead Corpse
(What would a free man do?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 3,261-3,280, 3,281-3,300, 3,301-3,320 ... 3,721-3,733 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson