Since you're determined to ignore my post #89, which shows a university and a law organization assuming the same equality between prescription and recommendation, how about addressing some of the other issues? Like the fact that there isn't sufficient research because the federal government makes it very difficult to do the studies, that they control the supply and several researchers say they can't get the quality or quantity they need for studies? That the MS society supports the research? The bottom line is that marijuana isn't treated like other drugs, including those which are far more addictive.
It does not, question beggar.
And here's the actual text of §11362.5(c):
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no physician in this state shall be punished, or denied any right or privilege, for having recommended marijuana to a patient for medical purposes.
The bottom line is that marijuana isn't treated like other drugs, including those which are far more addictive.
Quack nostrums usually aren't. And you can tell your imaginary friend I said so.