Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: retMD
1. They warned him that despite the California law, if he prescribed marijuana for any of his MS patients, he'd be arrested.

2. No, he was very clear on this - he was warned not to write a recommendation for marijuana for any of his patients.

Your story is mutating.

What's his name?

62 posted on 02/17/2007 3:43:07 AM PST by Mojave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: Mojave
This was a private conversation, and he did not give permission to publish his name, so I'm not posting it for him to become a target for email and possible harassment. He's affiliated with a major California medical center. His exact word was "prescribe". I accepted your information that it is actually a "recommendation in the file," but perhaps I shouldn't? According to this (caveat - comes from a cannabis site) the Supreme Court decision referenced was far from clear. "If, in making the recommendation," the court wrote, "the physician intends for the patient to use it as the means for obtaining marijuana, as a prescription is used as a means for a patient to obtain a controlled substance, then a physician would be guilty of aiding and abetting the violation of federal law."
77 posted on 02/17/2007 9:13:24 AM PST by retMD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson