To: NormsRevenge
I'm curious, Jet fuel, just a higher grade of kerosene?
That won't boost octane at all. And it was on the exhaust side?
This is not making sense.
8 posted on
02/14/2007 4:14:33 PM PST by
PSYCHO-FREEP
(" Judge not and thou shalt not be judged")
To: PSYCHO-FREEP
Correction, Instead of exhaust, I meant intake side.
11 posted on
02/14/2007 4:16:25 PM PST by
PSYCHO-FREEP
(" Judge not and thou shalt not be judged")
To: PSYCHO-FREEP
" This is not making sense."None of it does unless you're Team Chevy.
Ford has had a contender penalized.
Daimler has had strong drivers penalized.
Toyota (Phagh - pooey) is penalized for 'adding a less volatile substance(?).'
And Mr Goodwrench just marches on....
(Taking my tinfoil off now)
19 posted on
02/14/2007 4:54:15 PM PST by
norton
To: PSYCHO-FREEP
I'm curious, Jet fuel, just a higher grade of kerosene?
That won't boost octane at all. And it was on the exhaust side?
This is not making sense.
The arguement of whether or not it helps him is a moot point.
Fuel additives are illegal, period. It doesn't matter how well or how poorly the additive performs.
It's like using a corked bat in the majors, the league is not interested in the physics of an altered bat, they simply forbid it end of story.
35 posted on
02/15/2007 6:46:12 AM PST by
HEY4QDEMS
(Sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson