Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Iwo Jima

In a case like this, do you know if it is usual practice for criminal defense lawyers to have their own experts do ballistics?


281 posted on 02/17/2007 3:24:08 PM PST by Sue Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 279 | View Replies ]


To: Sue Bob
I can only go by what I read and hear. But it appears to me that more often than not the defense does not hire their own experts to check the prosecution's experts.

This was made painfully apparent in our crime lab scandal in Houston, where DNA tests were never run but the expert just made up results that fit the prosecution's case, and similar outrages. It only came to light when they were ordered to retest things in bulk. Any of these problems would have been known if a defense attorney had done anything to question the tests. But when asked about it, they seemed puzzled by the question, like, "Why would I question the prosecution's expert?"
284 posted on 02/17/2007 3:34:02 PM PST by Iwo Jima ("Close the border. Then we'll talk.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 281 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson