[Sue Bob]

Yeah. Why haven't they made them public?

Also, why did they file the criminal complaint on the basis of the March 18 report?

What are your questions? I'm sure I'm missing a lot.

[erton1]

I am sure they were made available to the defense.

[Iwo Jima]

1) If they had Ramos's weapon by 3/18, why didn't Correa see if he could match the bullet to that weapon on that date?

2) Why did Mr. Anonymous (whom I am betting is Chris Sanchez)swear in his affidavit on 3/18 that ballistics confirmed that the bullet came from Ramos's gun when it did not?

3) If they had a ballistics match as of 3/18, what were the 4/13 and 10/06 reports all about?

4) Why aren't any of these reports made available to the public?

5) If there is a ballistics report that says that the barrel of Ramos's weapon has "6 lands and groves inclined to the right" (whatever that means), why hasn't that been waved around like a red flag?

6) Who performed that 4/13 and 10/06 tests? If not Correa, were they having to shop around? Did Correa give them a bad report?

Even if there is a later ballistics report matching this bullet to Ramos's gun, it sure looks like that took a long time to determine that AND that they were under huge time pressures to get these guys indicted regardless of the facts. [Marching orders from somebody big?]

[calcowgirl]

Yeah. Why haven't they made them public?

There were 93 exhibits listed to the DHS-OIG report. They only made public THREE!
Very curious, but not inconsistent with the government's behavior in this case.