To: Iwo Jima
I would suggest you learn to live with dissappointment, because you have set an impossible bar to hurdle, one that is absurd. Nobody could satisfy you. You ask to "show me the testimony", but state that you wouldn't believe it was true anyway.
I don't know what you "have read" that you blindly accept as fact so that you can reject the sworn statements of five people, three of whom are keenly interested in finding fault with the evidence. You are essentially accepting the word of ignorant people and reporters over the sworn agreement of people trained in the law.
To: CharlesWayneCT
You are right about one thing -- I am hard to satisfy. As long as I have any inkling that an injustice has been done, I am like a bulldog.
But it is like the curious matter of the dog barking in the night (Sherlock Holmes reference -- the curious thing is that the dog didn't bark in the night).
Here, given the world of hurt Sutton is in, the curious matter is that he has not released the ballistics report or the expert's testimony. I'm betting that's because it was either inconclusive or acting exonerated Ramos.
We may have to agree to disagree on this point until we get more information released.
207 posted on
02/16/2007 1:20:49 PM PST by
Iwo Jima
("Close the border. Then we'll talk.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson