Yes, you do, but given your complete lack of evidence for any doubt on that point, and the clearly implied proof that we did from the statements about the ballistic test, the testimony of the two agents that they DID shoot at him, the stipulation of Ramos that they hit him, the testimony of Compean that the man looked hurt after Ramos shot him, the testimony of other agents that davilas needed help when he reached the van in Mexico, I would call your dispute baseless and therefore without merit.
And even if false, the evidence suggested we shot the guy, given we shot AT him 15 times, we thought we hit him, and he had a bullet wound -- and therefore it was reasonable, appropriate, and expected that we would treat the wound.