Replies

I haven't read them yet, but it certainly sounds that way (that the transcripts don't really help their case). They milked the "Sutton is evil" angle as long as they could, which was to be expected . . . now I presume people are waiting for Corsi to tell them what to think.

If you take the time to look a little further into Johnny Sutton's history, you would find that that is not an undeserved label. What makes this trial so frustrating to those of us familiar with Johnny Sutton is that his office is condemning the very same type of cover up and violation of Constitutional rights that Sutton employed in an earlier case of his that went awry.

The big guys like Sutton and Berger get to cover their tracks; the little guys get 10+ years for trying to cover theirs. How many years did Sandy Berger get for intentionally stealing and destroying highly classified secrets? Had that been me, I would be in jail for years.