[CharlesWayneCT]

WND is written by people with an agenda, who have shown no particular fealty to the facts in any matter in which they have a vested interest.

The DHS is an official department of the United States which is tasked with investigating criminal activity and providing evidence for trials.

So yes, I give more credence to the DHS report than I do to WND. Of course, WND's facts on the rare occasions that they provide a fact are often from the DHS reports. So they believe them when it's convenient.

My real reason for skepticism of WND is that whenever someone posts a WND article I can trivially show how they have twisted the facts and made up conclusions without basis in order to push their agenda. I post these regularly, and while I am vilified for that with name-calling and the like, nobody has refuted my objections to the articles.

[WesternPacific]

WND is written by people with an agenda

Probably true, but I would not discount the possibility that the authors or the individuals supplying the information for the DHS report of having an agenda also.

[WesternPacific]

My concern with the DHS report is that I do not know what evidence, if any, has been withheld or not allowed to be brought forward. I am skeptical of individuals or government officials within our government who seem to have an agenda or possibly a hidden agenda. It doesn't matter how many times a person reads and or studies the DHS report, if information is purposely left out of the report then that person will not be able to makes a valid judgment concerning the report without some reservations.

Maybe I'm a little paranoid, but our government has shown itself to be not fully forthcoming at times.

[Uncle Chip]

WND is written by people with an agenda

As are all of your posts ---