[McGavin999]

I liked it. I saw it as in your face. Decide

Decide? It's almost 2 years away, there is no way we can know a candidate now. He may well be all the things that were listed, but what if it turned out that he was also a transexual pedophile as well? Don't you think it would be smart to find out those thing before you decide?

I'm sorry, but picking a president isn't like choosing your favorite sports team. It's serious business and needs to be carefully thought out and the candidates need to be seriously vetted by people who actually care about voting.

[processing please hold]

No, no you misunderstood. Decide what you stand for. Are you a Republican Conservative and vote your values or vote for a rino because they have an R after their name.

As far as the later you mentioned about him, he's a zero on my scale now. He will not get my vote.

It's serious business and needs to be carefully thought out and the candidates need to be seriously vetted by people who actually care about voting.

I treat it as such. I'm always investigating the nominees and their choices, their votes. I not gonna vote a pig in a poke. My candidate will have all my support and all my support is going to Hunter. He's a conservative Republican on all I can find out about him.

[Jim Robinson]

The premise of the poll is that it is election day 2008 and your ballot lists Hillary Clinton (D) vs a right-wing conservative as the (R) for president. Who do you vote for? Should be obvious. I don't think it's offensive and I don't think it's forcing anyone to make an early decision. I simply want to find out how many of our members would actually vote for a so-called "unelectable" conservative if given the opportunity. The "too stupid vote" bit was a joke. I don't see how any member of FR would take more than one second to decide between Hillary and a qualified conservative Republican candidate (unless, perhaps, they are normally a third party voter. Hmmmm... and even then there should be no delay in deciding).