However, I also do not like a potential murderer to get away scott free with his crime. If he is not responsible for her death - fine! The evidence will show that. But, my point is, the assumption should be from the beginning that a CRIME may have occurred. Therefore it should be treated as a POTENTIAL CRIME - at the least manslaughter or 2nd degree murder. Go at it from that perspective. Treat it like a potential crime. Do NOT go on national TV the day it happens and say there is no evidence of a crime here!!!!
We've been told this police chief is top notch and tenacious. My point is - so far - I have heard NOTHING to convince me that anyone in an official capacity is treating Anna Nicole's death as a possible crime. That, to me, is totally against normal police procedure - for any investigation that is an honest, truthseeking one.
Ron Rales just said that Howard K. Stern is NOT the beneficiary in Anna Nicole Smith's will.
I guess that a BIG JOKE, because Anna Nicole Smith was never named is her husband MARSHALL's will either, was she?
Isn't that how it all got started?
But didn't this occur on American Indian land?