In addition to the baby sedative story in the week's In Touch magazine, on the same page is a picture of ANS taken 12 days prior to her death.
She was at a Bahama boat race and " was drunk."
" Her daughter was being taken care of by some random woman " says a witness.
Judge Seidlin had a duty to at least get the facts straight about the case, due to the time constraint of the unburied remains and the welfare of the baby.
It was obvious by his many remarks that he didn't have a clue about the background and history of the participants.
Which makes his courtroom antics even more reprehensible.
Somebody in authority ,somewhere has to put the welfare of the baby first, before it's too late.
For instance, had Judge Seidlin known that Anna had actually wanted Daniel buried in California, then he might've ruled differently.
"Somebody in authority, somewhere has to put the welfare of the baby first, before it's too late."
After I read this article last night, I felt that this guy is what the baby needs. Milstein has put everything aside and made this case his top priority now.
http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/living/columnists/steve_rothaus/16771888.htm