Ig the prosecutor told this to the jury, wouldn't he have to back that up with some evidence? If so, what was revealed during the trial?
You seem like you've been keeping a close eye on this event, so I assume you know what went on during the trial.
Yes, you would think so. But of course, DHS had nothing to submit. Nonetheless, that has not stopped Sutton from framing these guys as bad cops.
Court transcripts have not been completed, so no one - including the White House - knows what went on at that trial. It's my hunch that the reason they have not been transcribed is because they will not stand up to scrutiny. The prosecution is probably hoping to god that the furor dies down and people lose interest so they can quietly complete and file the transcripts.