i'm pretty sure Sutton said in an interview (maybe the WND interview) that the investigative reports weren't used in the trial, and that his statements were based on the actual witness testimony, not what was in any reports.
Anything to make these guys guilty. The repots show that the case against them is wrong. If he said he's just relying on witnesses, from waht Corsi said on teh radio today, Sutton's not telling the truth on that. Besides, his real case rests on a drug dealer whose perjury he is subornign.
There was a deputy sherrif in the area who shot at a vehicle that was advancing towards him, which had drugs, and Nifong Sutton prosecuted him too.