Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: CharlesWayneCT
He also convinced the judge not to put a DEA witness on the stand, who had possibly exculpatory evidence, because he (the DEA Agent) had been involved in a prior, October 2005) drug seizure of -- ta da -- Aldrete-Davila -- and since it was an "ongoing investigation" sealed.

It was determined that this would compromise Aldrets-Davila's integrity at the trial against the two BP agents. In addition another wittness involved in both cases was not allowed to testify because of the October 2005 case.

You also ignore that the HLS agent Sanchez took Davila to have the bullet removed and then took Davila to his home for the night ALONG WITH THE BULLET fragment, therefore breaking the chain of evidence.....

Last, you ignore the evidence that the path of the bullet actually bore out the story of both agents that he was running away from them and pointing a gun at them at the same time...

390 posted on 02/07/2007 8:29:46 AM PST by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 385 | View Replies ]


To: Arizona Carolyn

You have allowed opinion into your assertion of facts, and expressed disputed facts as if they are incontrovertable.


414 posted on 02/07/2007 9:17:17 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 390 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson