The cussed traitorous globalist march continues, Jim . . .
Ping.
NAFTA then the Partnership for Prosperity (P4P) in September 2001 which focused primarily on helping Mexico’s poor, migrant-producing states.
U.S.-Mexico Partnership For Prosperity
http://www.state.gov/e/rls/rm/2004/34020.htm
"To meet the challenge of global competition, we must strengthen cooperation under the partnership. We must create jobs where they are needed most, and to foster an environment in which no Mexican feels compelled to leave his home for lack of jobs or opportunities."
Cooperation good.
Then came the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America.
"[I]n March 2005, the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America, or SPP, provides a framework for us to advance collaboration in areas as diverse as security, transportation, the environment, and public health. The Partnership has increased our institutional contacts to respond to our vision of a stronger, more secure, and more prosperous region. Indeed, SPP’s goals are in many ways a broader version of much of P4P."
Collaboration bad.
See: "Elizabeth A. Whitaker, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Western Hemisphere Affairs, Department of State. House Committee on International Relations Subcommittee on the Western Hemisphere Immigration: Responding to a Regional Crisis, July 26, 2006"
At least Robert Pastor and the CFR proposal acknowledged the corruption and other problems in Mexico. Why do they not say "clean up your act, Mexico!"
It's an outrage that the government-created cesspool of Mexicorruption could be called America. Our military should turn its guns on Washington before that happens, IMO.
Which would explain why we do nothing about the reconquista.
Isn't it unconstitutional for Americans to persue such a thing? If a foreign nation wanted to be incorporated into the United States, that would be one thing, but to attempt to put an end to one's country as we know it seems to be a violation of the public trust.
Duncan Hunter 2008