Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ZULU

I took an archaeology class about American Indians. It was a intro class that touched on everything from paleo to modern, anywhere from the Rio Grande north. As an off the cuff comment the prof said that Bison bones are common in Plains Indian middens but aren't found in Woodland Indian middens. It's next to impossible to believe the native Woodland cultures wouldn't have Bison on the menu.

Bison did have a wide range and I'm not sure of the details but it's believed that at one time they were two different species that hybridized into the current single species. I know more about wolves and you are correct, there are several different subspecies of Canis lupus. Wolves are generally anti-social to stranger wolves so it's easy to imagine that as a reason for so many subspecies. Perhaps the difference with buffalo is that the herds never became truly segregated. There must have been gene flow across the plains.


22 posted on 02/02/2007 9:37:43 AM PST by Varda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: Varda

"the prof said that Bison bones are common in Plains Indian middens but aren't found in Woodland Indian middens. It's next to impossible to believe the native Woodland cultures wouldn't have Bison on the menu. "

Interesting. But they WERE in the east.

Read some early accounts of AMerican backwoodsmen hunting them for food. I'm sure they were a lot less common out east, but they WERE there.

Absence of evidence isn't proof of absence.


27 posted on 02/02/2007 2:07:31 PM PST by ZULU (Non nobis, non nobis Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam. God, guts and guns made America great.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson