To test you, not to defend hackers. Thanks for playing, you can quit your libel now.
I've already shown where criminal charges can be brought if only the hacks are distributed and not the hacked software itself.
True, but you never found the profit condition necessary for criminality in their actions under the DMCA. The way they can be nailed without any profit is under the NET Act, which is where the $1K/180day rule kicks in for actually distributing the copyrighted work. You've been told this. I'm not going to feed the troll by going around in circles on this again.
LOL yeah right, you're defending them with more twisted BS again right here like usual.