[beyond the sea]

Nicklaus won the Masters at 41. Tiger is every bit as strong, fit and good as Nicklaus was. I don't know anyone who has won a men's singles tennis slam when they were 41 in the recent past. Tiger will be wining slams for longer than Federer will.

You are either not very bright, or, you are just having a real bad day.

Just because one game (tennis) is much more physically demanding than the other (golf), thus careers are much shorter in tennis, has nothing to do with this discussion of excellence in one's sport.

Rationality is not your friend.

[ShawTaylor]

"Just because one game (tennis) is much more physically demanding than the other (golf), thus careers are much shorter in tennis, has nothing to do with this discussion of excellence in one's sport"

Naaaah.
It's because in practice, and for the past few decades, older men have won more golf slams than older men have won tennis tennis slams, I am saying Tiger is more likely to be winning slams for longer than Federer will.
BTW, am having an excellent day.
Real question is: are you?
You sound like you just made love with an angry bear.