[cogitator]

Transmission resumed for clarification.

You answered with an opinion, "I believe this warming is probably caused by something different."

It's not an opinion. Even discounting evidence of the prevailing cause for, the evidence against causality by the prior primary climate processes is comprehensive.

I.e., the Earth is not warming up as it has in the past (no matter what the meaning of "as"). The factors contributing to it and the climactic response to both rate and forcings are different.

Glad to hear I could amuse you.

Transmission terminated.

[Dominic Harr]

It's not an opinion.

Right :-D, not an opinion! I guess it all depends on the meaning of 'opinion'!

Have a great day.

[Mike Darancette]

It's not an opinion. Even discounting evidence of the prevailing cause for, the evidence against causality by the prior primary climate processes is comprehensive.

It might help things along if you can tell us:

1. The causes of the Holocene thermal maximum.
2. Which of those causes might be present now.
3. How do we know these things.

The only thing I can see as a difference is that we have Algore whining about it and the media and government stooge scientists telling horror stories.

[Thickman]

Why don't you just type "nah, nah, my ears are closed".