Once again I have shown criminal case history for Russians distributing software cracks to the world at large, which you have endlessly defended with lies you have even admitted to, meanwhile you have shown no criminal case history for someone making personal backups, despite your pitiful attempt to draw legal or moral equivalence between the two. You'll obviously just continue to lie on behalf of foreign criminals endlessly, but that's ok it's just more of an undeniable record of your deceit.
Yes you have. A legitimate company was selling cracking software all over the world, including to our government. Adobe complained, the FBI jumped on it, and lost. The main factor you always miss is that Elcomsoft admitted profit, necessary for a criminal case.
meanwhile you have shown no criminal case history for someone making personal backups
I don't have to. I'm going off the law, which is the same one broken by the Russians. In any case, it's not even my view, but the view that must result from the logic you've previously used.
Again, why, in your opinion, are DVD backups legal despite all of the court cases to the contrary concerning the tools necessary to make backups?