Replies

but still can't find one shred of actual evidence to show it was proper

I already have. Knowingly backing up circumvents a copy control, against the DMCA. Private financial gain can be found in a person relying on a backup when the original is destroyed, since he avoided paying for another DVD. Those are the two ingredients for criminality under 1201 & 1204 of the DMCA.

Simply more proof of your lies and undeniable deceit, for which there is obviously no end. You're clearly on the record for months defending the Russian hackers who distributed a crack to Apple's OSX operating system, insisting their actions couldn't be criminal, even laughably attempting to invoke the "180 day rule for criminal prosecution", insisting for months "it could only become a crime had they copied OS X itself and widely sold it", even calling Apple's letter threatening criminal prosecution quote "BS"!

But now LOL, despite your almost year long attempts to deny the Russian hackers were criminal, including lies you've already outright admitted to knowingly making up on your own regarding the US DoD on the hackers behalf, you're now trying to insist that someone making limited backups for personal use of their own media IS actually criminal, but not the Russian hackers that distributed a crack to the entire world? With not even one piece of case history to back it up?

LMAO, that has to be one of the most incredible attempts at BS I've ever seen on here, even from you LOL. According to you, basically everyone BUT the actual criminal Russian hackers is criminal LMAO. Face it, the facts are to-wit, not only are you an obvious liberal phony, and Russian/Chicomm/Commie sympathizer, you also don't even care if it's proven, over and over and over. Great, because I want just as many people to know about the depth of your evil as possible. The fact you're proud of it is even more reason for honest folks to be aware.