You're not wondering anything, you're obviously talking in circles on purpose when a monkey could see the difference in that nothing was distributed to others when a personal backup is made of one's own media. So play games all you want, meanwhile not even chimps are fooled, while those slightly smarter realize it's more of your desperate attempts to deceive.
I was only following your logic from previous posts to reach that obvious conclusion.
No quite obviously you've been trying to put words in my mouth, all along in this thread starting with post 45, clearly in desperation of your failing defense of the foreign hackers you support who distributed a crack of Apple's OSX to the world at large. now here you are trying to lower the bar for them and claim making personal backups of one's own media is equivalent, something you knew wasn't true when you posted it.
How do you think the person who makes a backup got the tool with which to do it? Somebody broke Sec. 1201 of the DMCA by distributing a circumvention tool. The person making the backup then violates the same section of the law by using it.
clearly in desperation of your failing defense of the foreign hackers you support who distributed a crack of Apple's OSX to the world at large
Kind of like the hackers who distributed the tools to crack the DVD DRM and got sued by the content owners for doing it?
You just haven't explained why a backup of a DVD is legal, and breaking HD-DVD, PDF and OS X are illegal.