He's not.
He simply is not. Continuing to repeat your arguments will not make them true.
Sure he is, he's obviously trying to define "criminal" down, lowering the bar for actual criminals such as the ones he has been defending for just under a year now. He tries to sneak it in now though, since he's been shot down several times already and even admitted to knowingly lying on defense of these Russian hackers he still insists aren't criminals, but he tries to sneak it in now and put words in my mouth that I would call personal backups criminal, when there's no evidence personal backups are criminal, while there IS evidence what he supports is criminal though, but of course he calls that "BS".
He's obviously just spinning in circles now, if you choose to believe his "BS", that is fine, if not expected, we've never seen you make a single comment in support of intellectual property protection either, have we? Shock us all and bring out one recent post from you in outrage over illegal hacking, just one that somehow defended the victim. Hopefully there is at least one, but I don't remember seeing it.