More lies, as clearly a portion of the Apple case involved cracking Apple's DRM, which you insisted for months couldn't have been criminal. Remember you trotting out the "180 day rule for criminal prosecution" on behalf of your foreign hacker heroes, and insisting they had to distribute the entire O/S to qualify as criminal, which of course turned out to be a another lie. Yet here you are trying to lie your way out of it again, being an admittedly Godless man who has no morals, no shame either obviously but I'm willing to keep bumping this thread because while it's mainly a waste of bandwidth it shows the depth of your evil and how far you're willing to go to defend foreign criminals.
... according to the information in the article, which showed no financial gain on the part of the hackers. Why do you keep going around in circles?
Remember you trotting out the "180 day rule for criminal prosecution" on behalf of your foreign hacker heroes, and insisting they had to distribute the entire O/S to qualify as criminal
You were the one falsely claiming they were distributing the OS itself, which would allow prosecution under a law different than the DMCA. I explained that law to you, and you keep mocking that law. This is just a rehash too in order to avoid the issue at hand, which is DVD backups.
Yet here you are trying to lie your way out of it again, being an admittedly Godless man
I can always tell when you are losing, because you bring this up. You were caught on doing this before.
So back to the question: In your personal opinion, which can't be right or wrong, just your opinion, is backing up your own personal DVD illegal? If not, why?