Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: snarks_when_bored

Understand.

I thought there was some mention of the bomber range in the first story. I forget.

Of course, UFO's sometimes do their thing over bomber ranges . . . neutralizing things in the process.

But, generally, I'd agree with you.


80 posted on 01/26/2007 7:30:58 AM PST by Quix (LET GOD ARISE AND HIS ENEMIES BE SCATTERED. LET ISRAEL CALL ON GOD AS THEIRS! & ISLAM FLUSH ITSELF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]


To: Quix
I thought there was some mention of the bomber range in the first story. I forget.

Here's the way this thread's original story mentions Fort Chaffee:

WND surveyed local police and sheriffs agencies, as well as Fort Chaffee, a decommissioned Army base in the region, and no one reported anything out of the ordinary.

Fort Chaffee is characterized as a decommissioned Army base. No mention is made of the fact that the lights were seen directly over the base!

And here's how the more recent story that I linked to in post #77 on this thread reads:

Officials say the colorful illuminations seen Jan. 9 over western Arkansas came from special military flares that slowly parachuted to the ground as part of an Air Force training mission involving A-10 aircraft pilots at nearby Fort Chaffee, a base used for testing weaponry.

Now Fort Chaffee is characterized as a base used for testing weaponry. That's a significant change. WND didn't do their homework on the original story, it seems to me.

81 posted on 01/26/2007 8:01:56 AM PST by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson