You lack a legitimate reply so you resort to attacking the poster for a misspelled word? Good choice, you just ruined your credibility with many people who might have been agreeing with you up to this point. (Though I don't believe there were many of those to begin with).
You are incorrect. I have already posted legitimate replies. The poster I was mocking jabbed me with the pointy stick first by saying "you unable to understand", a clear implication that I'm an Ignorant animal hater as I have been called by these folks earlier on the thread.
If you want to attack me for being snarky in my posts, you would have a bit more credibility if you admonished the person who referred to me as a PSO MF, what do you think they meant by that. So don't patronize as if you "might have been agreeing", you can't even admonish someone honestly. Look at yourself.
Although I do not agree that the guy should have ordered the dogs to attack I do not see much difference to that than cops sending in attack dogs against an armed citizen holed up in a building. If it is not cruelty for the cops to do it then it should not be cruelty for a citizen to do it. Criminal assault yes, cruelty no.