This makes no sense what so ever? If Nifong had to subpeona her, does that mean she does not want to show for the 5 Feb. hearing?
I can only guess he met with her to go over and over the latest version of the story either that of 21 Dec. or some new revised version that explains her showing up with one shoe?
New thread Nifong recuses:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1766717/posts?page=12
Would even Nifong be stupid enough to let her change her story again after her only meeting with him?
Perhaps he will say that she was too terrified to testify, so in interest of justice he was compelled to subpoena her?