Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Sacajaweau
She's not under oath. There is no perjury.

She perjured herself when she filed a false police report. THAT is against the law.

271 posted on 01/11/2007 9:47:01 AM PST by NRA2BFree (May you always have love to share, health to spare, and friends that care.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies ]


To: NRA2BFree
The technical difference is that she has made false statements to police and filed a false polce report, not committed perjury while under oath in a court of law.

This was clearly never going to trial because she could not take the stand and testify without committing perjury. And she as a witness is automatically impeached with the old "So were you lying then, or are you lying now?".
286 posted on 01/11/2007 10:08:29 AM PST by NorthFlaRebel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies ]

To: NRA2BFree

It may be against the law but if she's certifiably nuts (which has been claimed) it's not prosecutable.


329 posted on 01/11/2007 11:30:31 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson