To: Locomotive Breath
The reason this may not be a smoke screen, as someone else mentioned upthread, is in court when RS's alibi was mentioned Nifong made a smirking response about the defense not know "his" timeline. I think this has been planned since RS alibi information was made public. I think Nifong's got a legal duty to reveal "his" timeline, doesn't he?
264 posted on
01/11/2007 9:39:09 AM PST by
r9etb
To: r9etb
Long ago, the defense put in a motion asking for a "bill of particulars" which would have required Nifong to do just that. Nifong made some nasty remark about the three needing to account for themselves for about two hours one night and it was too bad if they couldn't do that. The motion was denied but the judge left open the option to refile it.
To: r9etb
335 posted on
01/11/2007 11:39:18 AM PST by
Jezebelle
(Our tax dollars are paying the ACLU to sue the Christ out of us.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson