Posted on 01/11/2007 7:25:16 AM PST by SmoothTalker
oh she is clearly as dumb as a post, that was evident early on. either that or so drug-addled she doesn't know which end is up. or what's a penis and what isn't, LOL!
i thought that all of the LAX players gave DNA samples and none of the dna identified in her was from any of them.
( I suggest each chapter deal w/the same crime but w/different details and characters; let the reader decide what happened and who committed the crime...Best Seller material! Ha)
Your theory is wrong---The DNA found in and on the accuser was not from ANY LACROSSE player.
Not sure how accurate this is. I was just browsing the other day and saved this. I'm sure someone here has something better.
http://www.answers.com/topic/2006-duke-university-lacrosse-team-scandal
You are all too kind, I really don't deserve it though. But, if I am going to go on the date, I MUST insist that all my fellow FReepers go along as chaperones and everyone have a functioning cellphone camera. Further, I want Nifong there at all times. He can be the driver.
She's qualifies as a "penis expert".....apparently didn't have her glasses on...so she couldn't see "it"....so she guessed. Too funny!!
Your theory is wrong. The LAX team was tested. NO DNA match.
That doesn't fly either. The DNA tests on the numerous different semen samples found in her vagina and panties excluded all members of the lacrosse team.
maggief posted it up the thread.
A) Nifong's ego can't take anymore abuse ~ and it's only going to get worse from here on out; B) Nifong has want he wanted, a job for the next 3.5 years and retirement (at a rate of pay much higher than he would have had as an ADA); C) pressure from above.
Take your pick - I don't think there are any wrong answers....
She doesn't know what a penis is? Oh, so THAT's why she has had so many children. Somebody't been spinnin' some tall tales to that girl!
Dang! LOL. I should have scrolled down. :)
You obviously haven't kept up....the DNA did NOT match ANY of the team members ....all of them gave samples of their DNA and none matched the FIVE unknown DNAs found inside her.
". . . the woman said she was no longer certain that the men had vaginally assaulted her with their penises.
This is cracking me up. I have no idea why."
Me too - I don't know why either!
>>At approximately 11:50 p.m., I saw from my porch that a car had been stopped directly in front of 610, and noted that two young women, both appearing to be African-American, were walking from the direction of the car and proceeded to the back-yard entrance of 610. One of the two was dressed in an extremely short tan skirt and was wearing high heels. Her hair was pinned up above her ears. The other woman was more conservatively dressed in pants and a sweater or blouse of some sort, and her hair was shoulder-length and curly. The two women briefly spoke with one of the men who was in the back yard. I remember hearing that he lived "at the other house," which in retrospect I assume to be the house on Urban Ave. that also was rented to Duke lacrosse team members. This man then left in the direction of Watts St., apparently to the residence to which he had just referred. Another young man spoke briefly with the two women just outside the back door of 610, and then proceeded indoors. At this point no one was outside of 610 besides the two young women.
Bissey media interview:
Two young women, one of them dressed in a short skirt and high heels, and the other woman was dressed a little more conservatively spoke with the gentleman outside of this door here briefly, and then at this point, all of the young men were inside. They spoke amongst themselves for about five minutes or so and then entered the house.
about 11:55 p.m., Jason Bissey police statement:
A very brief conversation between the two women ensued, which I observed by switching to another chair on my porch. The more conservatively dressed woman noticed me at least once, when we made eye contact. She was speaking to the more proactively-dressed woman in a tone that I deduced through body language to be a sort of coaching, as if she was preparing her for something that she herself was comfortable with, but needed to talk the woman with the short skirt though it. I did not overhear any specific words at that time. Twice that I noticed during this conversation, a man or two different men opened the back door of 610 and spoke to the women, and the more conservatively dressed woman responded both times something to the effect that they would "be right there," or "just give us a minute."<<
The only way THAT theory would work is if there were males at the party who weren't on the team.
About the SANE nurse:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1765964/posts
Relatively little has appeared in the public record about Levicy. What is known doesn’t suggest a figure whose neutrality would inspire confidence. Her undergraduate degree, from the University of Maine, came in women’s studies—the discipline that produced copious Group of 88 members, and home of feminist law theory, which contends that women never lie about rape.
She stated that one of her proudest moments in college came when she produced and directed a performance of Eve Ensler’s The Vagina Monologues. Before becoming a nurse, Levicy worked as a healthcare associate for Planned Parenthood, a whitewater rafting guide, and a leader of outdoor programs for the University of Maine. Directly before coming to North Caroline, she was employed by a wilderness program, where she told people, “If saying the word, vagina feels foreign, then I recommend looking into a mirror and saying, vagina . . . vagina . . . vagina.” This rhetoric is not exactly mainstream on issues of gender.
"No DNA then back to the broom theory. Did they check her for splinters?"
You now owe me a keyboard!!!!!
The cell phone records show she was on the phone until 11:36.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.