That's a very good suggestion. Nobody debates better than Medved. Especially when it comes to historical issues.
That's what gets me. I don't get his radio show near me, but from what I've read of his columns, he seems to be a smart guy who presents his case very rationally and persuasively. That's why I'm at a loss over his over-the-top, hysterical, and borderline slanderous piece that ignited this whole thing in the first place. It was so uncharacteristic.