Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: sig226

Then I don't get the implication you see for the cosmological constant.


12 posted on 01/09/2007 6:31:50 AM PST by UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide (Give Them Liberty Or Give Them Death! - IT'S ISLAM, STUPID! - Islam Delenda Est! - Rumble thee forth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
The cosmological constant tries to adjust the observed amount of cosmic mass to fit the theory of relativity. Rather than admitting that we have insufficient data, theorists are fudging the numbers to try to make the facts fit the theory. They are also reluctant to admit that the theory is wrong.

I find this wasteful. Instead of guessing at why the numbers don't work, I think we should be using our resources to find out why the numbers don't work. How much mass is missing? (I used to know.) How can we be missing (failing to observe) it? How can we discover it? Or is there a problem with the theory and we haven't yet realized it?

When we go back to forcing our data to fit our model with cosmic constants and such, the data are speaking and we're not listening. Or, as a famous smartass once wrote, "When the facts do not fit the theory, they must be disposed of."

14 posted on 01/09/2007 1:46:52 PM PST by sig226 (See my profile for the democrat culture of corruption list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson