Duke Lacrosse Accuser Gives Birth

WRAL ^ | 1/04/07

[maggief]

Chapel Hill — WRAL has confirmed that the accuser in the Duke lacrosse case gave birth at UNC Hospitals on Wednesday.

Sources tell WRAL the woman had the baby by Cesarean section. She was not due until February.

[Ken H]

More on Professor Peterwood (heh heh):

http://durhamwonderland.blogspot.com/2006/10/seligmann-speaks-out.html

[Alia]

There's some very bad mojo in Durham.

[Alia]

When doing individual searches (Kristiana Bennett and Denita Smith), I noted both worked on the Echo, both English majors, and both worked on a black "academic" committee together; but those items didn't show up when I did joint name searches. Maybe they participated at different times?

[Alia]

Kim Curtis (courtesy of Freeper Rodney King)

[Protect the Bill of Rights]

links:

http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:TgCwjkJQQiAJ:www.adult-web-cams-webcams.com/node/849+%22Kristiana+Bennett%22+webcam&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=2

---

http://blog.lordsutch.com/archives/3345

Thursday, 6 April 2006
Interesting items from NCCU's reporting
Commenter Igor provided a link to this article in Tuesday’s St. Petersburg Times that looks at the efforts of NCCU Campus Echo reporter Kristiana Bennett to get local residents to go on record with “unflattering things about the accuser… that defense attorneys hire[] private investigators to find.” Another Echo reporter talked with local escort services and found that it is unusual for adult entertainers to work without bodyguards or bouncers.

# By Chris Lawrence @ 9:23 pm CDT « (0)
Manual TrackBack URL for this entry: http://blog.lordsutch.com/tb.cgi/3345
Tags: Academe, Crime, Duke, Durham, Lacrosse, NCCU, Sports

[Protect the Bill of Rights]

from above link:

Another Echo reporter talked with local escort services and found that it is unusual for adult entertainers to work without bodyguards or bouncers.

(Bold mine) Who is that other reporter?
Confirmed what we knew about the strippers having no escort.

Now what about that white car?

Oh yeah, did I mention that Brian Taylor drives around some very important people at NCCU?

[Jezebelle]

Thanks, Alia.

Curtis looks like the quintessential Marxism-spouting hag.

I hope she spends a fortune on legal fees.

[Alia]

I think we can both safely assume, at this moment, her hopes for that breast augmentation is kaput.

Curtis looks like the quintessential Marxism-spouting hag.

I read the legal doc - she just folded so quickly, just like a rat scurrying away under a bright light.

[Ken H]

From a commenter at the Liestoppers Board:

Don't get bogged down in evaluating the strength of the Dowd claims in the abstract (and a firm of the reputation of Poyner Spruill would not be involved in filing frivolous claims). The case, and others like it, will not be thrown out before substantial discovery is allowed, and discovery is what Duke cannot tolerate. Each bit of information, no matter how small, will be cross-referenced with everything else that can be learned. Then smart men and women will use that palette of information to paint a picture. And very little will be confidential.

Large law firms with complex litigation capabilities are awesome machines. They move slowly, at great cost, and their targets are never the same afterwards, win, lose or draw. Duke will pay anything to end this yesterday. I'm a retired general counsel and that's my opinion.

http://z9.invisionfree.com/LieStoppers_Board/index.php?showtopic=1246&view=findpost&p=7254525

[Sue Perkick]

Bet she hopes Susan Sarandon will play her in the movie.

[xoxoxox]

On the flip side
Does the profession decide the fate

By Larisha Stone, Echo Staff Writer, Campus Echo NCCU April 5, 2006.

Students of both N.C. Central University and Duke University have a lot to say about the role the victim’s profession plays in the alleged assault.

Did the victim “ask for it?” some wonder.

The overwhelming response is no, but there are some students who have mixed feelings.

Criminal justice senior Christopher Bridges gave a scenario.

“If someone told me not to go to the edge of a cliff because the rocks were loose, I would avoid the cliff as much as possible,” he said.

“A rational person would walk far away from the cliff to avoid danger. If you do go near the cliff, you’re tempting fate. If you fall off the cliff, then fate got you.”

Junior nursing student at Duke University Bridgette Moynahan feels that no woman deserves to be raped, no matter what.

“Women have a hard time claiming ownership of their bodies in a society of rape culture,” she said.

“If she was lying naked on the sidewalk, she deserves to be helped, not taken advantage of.”

Media outlets have claimed that the victim worked for an escort service.

A representative of A Better Service Escort Service claims that there is no way that that could be true.

“They say she was a dancer, but worked for an escort service,” the representative said.

“Dancers work for entertainment services and there’s a difference. Why was she there without a bouncer? She went there with no one. She didn’t deserve it, but she was a fool,” the representative continued to say.

Wes Ray, owner of Bare Minimum Limousine and Entertainment Service has been in the entertainment business for 11 years. He gave further insight.

“The entertainers never went unassisted. Male security met clients at the door.”

He said that he never had a problem with disruption or disrespect of his dancers at Duke University functions, but he did add that “if those boys called an escort service, they knew they had a better chance of getting more than entertainment.”

http://www.nccu.edu/campus/echo/archive11-0506/c-flip.html

[Ready4Freddy]

She's been in Durham for a while, and hey, look, her birthday is coming up in 6 days! ;>)

North Carolina Voter Detail

Full Name CURTIS, KIMBERLEY FOSTER	Mailing Name KIMBERLEY FOSTER CURTIS	Date of Birth 1956-01-10 00:00:00	Birth Location OC
Gender Female	Race WHITE	Ethnicity NOT HISPANIC or NOT LATINO	Resident Street Address 1305 WATTS ST
Resident City-State-Zip Code DURHAM NC 27701	Mail Address 1 1305 WATTS ST	Mail Address 2	Mail Address 3
Mail Address 4	Mail City-State-Zip Code DURHAM NC 27701	Full Phone Number	Drivers License No.
Voter Reg. No. 000000595819	Registration Date 1988-10-04 00:00:00	County DURHAM	Status Code A
Voter Status ACTIVE	Reason AV	Voter Status Reason VERIFIED	Absent N
Party DEMOCRATIC	Precinct WATTS STREET SCHOOL	Municipality DURHAM	Ward WARD 1
Congressional District 4TH CONGRESS	Superior Court 14B SUPERIOR COURT	Judicial District 14TH JUDICIAL	NC Senate 20TH SENATE
NC House 30TH HOUSE	County Commission	Township	School District SCHOOL 2A
Fire District	Water District	Sewer District	Sanitation District
Rescue District	Munic. District	Dist. 1 14TH PROSECUTORIAL	Dist. 2
Confidential N	Age Age 41 - 65
Above information as provided by state - below is our annotations
	Address (click to find others) 1305 WATTS ST
City/State/Zip (click to find others) DURHAM NC 27701-1134

Voter History

County Durham	County Description DURHAM	Election ID 19	Election Date 1991-10-08 00:00:00
Election Label 10/08/1991	Election Description 1991 MUNICIPAL PRIMARY	Voting Method Legacy	Voted Party Code
Voted Party Description	Precinct Label	Precinct Description

County Durham	County Description DURHAM	Election ID 20	Election Date 1991-11-05 00:00:00
Election Label 11/05/1991	Election Description 1991 MUNICIPAL ELECTION	Voting Method Legacy	Voted Party Code
Voted Party Description	Precinct Label	Precinct Description

County Durham	County Description DURHAM	Election ID 21	Election Date 1992-05-05 00:00:00
Election Label 05/05/1992	Election Description 1992 PRIMARY	Voting Method Legacy	Voted Party Code
Voted Party Description	Precinct Label	Precinct Description

County Durham	County Description DURHAM	Election ID 23	Election Date 1992-11-03 00:00:00
Election Label 11/03/1992	Election Description 1992 GENERAL ELECTION	Voting Method Legacy	Voted Party Code
Voted Party Description	Precinct Label	Precinct Description

County Durham	County Description DURHAM	Election ID 24	Election Date 1993-10-05 00:00:00
Election Label 10/05/1993	Election Description 1993 MUNICIPAL PRIMARY	Voting Method Legacy	Voted Party Code
Voted Party Description	Precinct Label	Precinct Description

County Durham	County Description DURHAM	Election ID 25	Election Date 1993-11-02 00:00:00
Election Label 11/02/1993	Election Description 1993 GENERAL ELECTION	Voting Method Legacy	Voted Party Code
Voted Party Description	Precinct Label	Precinct Description

County Durham	County Description DURHAM	Election ID 28	Election Date 1994-11-08 00:00:00
Election Label 11/08/1994	Election Description 1994 GENERAL ELECTION	Voting Method Legacy	Voted Party Code
Voted Party Description	Precinct Label	Precinct Description

County Durham	County Description DURHAM	Election ID 29	Election Date 1995-10-10 00:00:00
Election Label 10/10/1995	Election Description 1995 MUNICIPAL PRIMARY	Voting Method Legacy	Voted Party Code
Voted Party Description	Precinct Label	Precinct Description

County Durham	County Description DURHAM	Election ID 30	Election Date 1995-11-07 00:00:00
Election Label 11/07/1995	Election Description 1995 MUNICIPAL ELECTION	Voting Method Legacy	Voted Party Code
Voted Party Description	Precinct Label	Precinct Description

County Durham	County Description DURHAM	Election ID 31	Election Date 1996-05-07 00:00:00
Election Label 05/07/1996	Election Description 1996 PRIMARY	Voting Method ABSENTEE	Voted Party Code
Voted Party Description	Precinct Label	Precinct Description

County Durham	County Description DURHAM	Election ID 34	Election Date 1997-10-07 00:00:00
Election Label 10/07/1997	Election Description 1997 MUNICIPAL PRIMARY	Voting Method Legacy	Voted Party Code
Voted Party Description	Precinct Label	Precinct Description

County Durham	County Description DURHAM	Election ID 35	Election Date 1997-11-04 00:00:00
Election Label 11/04/1997	Election Description 1997 MUNCIPAL ELECTION	Voting Method Legacy	Voted Party Code
Voted Party Description	Precinct Label	Precinct Description

County Durham	County Description DURHAM	Election ID 36	Election Date 1998-05-05 00:00:00
Election Label 05/05/1998	Election Description 1998 PRIMARY	Voting Method Legacy	Voted Party Code
Voted Party Description	Precinct Label	Precinct Description

County Durham	County Description DURHAM	Election ID 38	Election Date 1998-11-03 00:00:00
Election Label 11/03/1998	Election Description 1998 GENERAL ELECTION	Voting Method Legacy	Voted Party Code
Voted Party Description	Precinct Label	Precinct Description

County Durham	County Description DURHAM	Election ID 39	Election Date 1998-12-08 00:00:00
Election Label 12/08/1998	Election Description 1998 SPECIAL ELECTION	Voting Method Legacy	Voted Party Code
Voted Party Description	Precinct Label	Precinct Description

County Durham	County Description DURHAM	Election ID 43	Election Date 2000-05-02 00:00:00
Election Label 05/02/2000	Election Description 2000 PRIMARY	Voting Method IN-PERSON	Voted Party Code DEM
Voted Party Description DEMOCRATIC	Precinct Label	Precinct Description

County Durham	County Description DURHAM	Election ID 47	Election Date 2001-11-06 00:00:00
Election Label 11/06/2001	Election Description 2001 MUNICIPAL ELECTION	Voting Method PROV	Voted Party Code
Voted Party Description	Precinct Label 02	Precinct Description WATTS STREET SCHOOL

County Durham	County Description DURHAM	Election ID 48	Election Date 2002-09-10 00:00:00
Election Label 09/10/2002	Election Description 09/10/2002 PRIMARY	Voting Method IN-PERSON	Voted Party Code DEM
Voted Party Description DEMOCRATIC	Precinct Label 02	Precinct Description WATTS STREET SCHOOL

County Durham	County Description DURHAM	Election ID 50	Election Date 2002-11-05 00:00:00
Election Label 11/05/2002	Election Description 11/05/2002 GENERAL	Voting Method IN-PERSON	Voted Party Code DEM
Voted Party Description DEMOCRATIC	Precinct Label 02	Precinct Description WATTS STREET SCHOOL

County Durham	County Description DURHAM	Election ID 51	Election Date 2003-10-07 00:00:00
Election Label 10/07/2003	Election Description 2003 MUNICIPAL PRIMARY	Voting Method IN-PERSON	Voted Party Code
Voted Party Description	Precinct Label 02	Precinct Description WATTS STREET SCHOOL

County Durham	County Description DURHAM	Election ID 52	Election Date 2003-11-04 00:00:00
Election Label 11/04/2003	Election Description 2003 MUNICIPAL GENERAL	Voting Method ABSENTEE	Voted Party Code
Voted Party Description	Precinct Label 02	Precinct Description WATTS STREET SCHOOL

The detail view of this record will be recorded as one 'Detail look-up'.

[Ready4Freddy]

I reported my post #352 in case posting Kim Curtis' voter registration info isn't appropriate on FR (all legally public info, mind you ;).

[Excuse_My_Bellicosity]

Yup, probably a pro ballplayer, rich govt. official, or celebrity from her locale.

[JLS]

Wow if this is true and it sounds like it is, if I read the article right that Duke reivse their grades upward, then this is a huge scandle in its own right. And someone may get fired over it.

[JLS]

Rule number one in avoiding books by idiots is to skip those with a colon ":" in the title.

Hey wait a second, I think my second published article had a colon in the title!

[Fido969]

Interesting that Professor Curtis claims to be an expert on abuse of power and socialization of gender roles.

She doesn't seem to be very bright though - she thinks that the Clinton case was about charges of unwanted sexual advances on Lewinsky. She just ignores the Gennifer Flowers, et al, etc. business.

[JLS]

I wonder what a search of her political donations reported to the federal elections commision would reveal?

[JLS]

Of course she is not very bright. If she were bright and thought things out, she would find she could not hold the views she wants to hold.

If she is really a visiting prof, I would guess Duke will terminate her immediately. Which in academics might not get rid of her for a year.

I agree too with whomever said she should be removed from the classroom immediately. You know that is what Duke would do, if some prof starting failing black students for no good reason.

[JLS]

I just read the complaint against Duke and Kim Curtis. It is well crafted.

The damage amount include acutal and punitive damages and all say in EXCESS of $10,000. This is likely require to file by NC tort law, but that means the plaintiffs may be asking for any amount more. I would guess they will ask for in the 7 or 8 figure range.