I think that's the best description of him, he's right on Iraq, wrong on Mexican immigration and so forth.
I'm curious to see what Tancredo will be like... uh-oh... supporting him is bannable offence......
;)
Rep. Tancredo rubs me the wrong way, because he's (typographically) shouting all the time. I think it's important to maintain the distinction between "anti-immigration" and "anti-immigrant," just as it's important to maintain the distinction between "anti-crime" and "anti-black."
I think there's too much discussion about "illegal immigrants," and not enough about "employers of illegal immigrants" (i.e., citizens) and "welfare-providers for illegal immigrants" (i.e., officials elected by citizens).
Always remember - GOVERNMENT is the enemy. Government - our government, elected by us - allows illegal immigration, allow employers to exploit (peonize, enslave) illegal immigrants, provides houses, cars, education, medical care, utility service, etc., etc. ... to illegal immigrants. Our government.
The same government that thinks my mother is more dangerous on an airplane than a Saudi Imam.
Bush, in trying to be all things to all people, has failed in some areas. We may be good parents, but fail miserably as children. Or we may be good with a household budget, but we can't fix a car.
Does that make us failures?
So what if Bush is wrong on Immigration? Perhaps the next person to take up THAT torch is excellent. And if he "fails" as far as Ireland is concerned, how can we, as Amercans fault that? Are the Irish citizens a direct threat to this country?
What does your tagline say? ...