Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
1990: Windows 3.0

I would not consider an operating system an "app". I may even have a difficult time considering Windows 3.0 an "operating system".
6 posted on 12/18/2006 10:21:19 AM PST by jaydubya2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: jaydubya2
I would not consider an operating system an "app". I may even have a difficult time considering Windows 3.0 an "operating system".

Windows 3.0 was not an OS. It was a GUI app running on top of DOS, which was the OS.

12 posted on 12/18/2006 10:28:28 AM PST by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: jaydubya2

I think the original MAC OS should be number 1 as an OS, with kudos to the PARC syatem at Palo Alto Xerox for spawning it. Everything done since by MicroSoft and Apple came from that system; apple trying to get better and MS trying to keep up.


14 posted on 12/18/2006 10:31:16 AM PST by carolinalivin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: jaydubya2
I may even have a difficult time considering Windows 3.0 an "operating system".

Technically speaking Windows 3.0 was not an OS.

DOS 4.0, DOS 5.0 were the Operating systems. Windows 3.0 and 3.1 were applications that overlayed the OS....i.e, you could delete the Windows directory from the command line using DOS.

With the advent of Windows 95....Windows WAS the OS.

53 posted on 12/18/2006 2:40:17 PM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts (This is my tagline. There are many like it but this one is mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson