Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Lonesome in Massachussets
"I still get drawn into reverse engineering someone's FORTRAN mess from time to time, but only the only good reason for using FORTRAN anymore is job security, no one else will ever want to "own" your code"

When I start delving into a new FORTRAN code I grep for # of occurrences of GOTO and then divide that number by line count. That forms my cr_ppyness percent (CRP).

Anything above 0% CRP is bad. Fortran 90 never really caught on at least where I work. I still have to deal with a lot of Fortran 66 with arithmatic ifs etc. as if 77 isn't bad enough.

But our new employees over the past five years are experienced in Matlab and that is the direction we're trending. There is a reluctance to go with a proprietary language though.

59 posted on 12/18/2006 5:12:40 PM PST by avg_freeper (Gunga galunga. Gunga, gunga galunga)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: avg_freeper
There is a reluctance to go with a proprietary language [matlab] though.

It's better than Excel, with matlab at least, when you buy the application, you own it. Also, Mathworks sells matlab to ANSII C "compilers". I've written functions in matlab in a day that would take weeks (or more) to code and unit test in C.

70 posted on 12/19/2006 2:17:36 AM PST by Lonesome in Massachussets (The hallmark of a crackpot conspiracy theory is that it expands to include countervailing evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson