Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: texas booster; Senator Bedfellow
I had a ping about the cost of electricity to run F@H. For me, there is no additional cost (or it is under a dollar per month). I run all my systems 24/7 anyway, and folding is a much better use of idle cycles than fishies.

Senator Bedfellow posted this almost a year ago about his experience:

I once calculated it (for Seti@home) at about $7-$8/month for for 24/7 crunching on three machines versus 24/7 idling. Of course, I drive my boxes pretty hard anyway - I do a lot of video encoding and such - so my machines are hardly idling 24/7 anyway, meaning the difference was pretty negligible in the end. I suspect that spare cycles tend to be scarcer for me than a lot of folks, but YMMV :)

23 posted on 12/17/2006 9:46:16 AM PST by texas booster (Join FreeRepublic's Folding@Home team (Team # 36120))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: texas booster
re. - the cost of electricity. I'll reference this post I made earlier in the year.

While idling, my main machine draws about 124-125 watts; as soon as I crank up Folding the consumption rises to 150-151. So, running Folding on this machine is about the equivalent of a 25W light bulb. Your mileage will vary.

I keep the machines running 24x7 so consuming a little more power is not a big issue.

24 posted on 12/17/2006 10:34:45 AM PST by ken in texas (come fold with us.... team #36120)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson