Skip to comments.
4-year-old suspended after hugging teacher's aide
Associated Press ^
| Dec. 10, 2006
Posted on 12/10/2006 3:38:09 PM PST by kingattax
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
To: Philistone
Well unless the kid had his tongue out and was going "hubba hubba hubba" I'd have to agree... Does make you wonder what the teacher's aide looks like in that department, doesn't it. lol
To: D-Chivas
Naw the 4 year old probably flunked pre kindergarden sex education.
To: paulat
"Wasn't "brushing." This wasn't a tiny, little 4-year-old. This was a kid performing a vulgarity he learned at home."
That is wrong on so many levels. Unless you were there I think the odds are FAR greater that this was a little kid hugging his teacher who misintrepreted it. She misinterpreted it based on BS training the broken education system gave her.
The act itself isn't vulgar either under the proper circumstances, like a hubby and a wife.
To: driftdiver
I think the odds are FAR greater that this was a little kid hugging his teacher who misintrepreted it. She misinterpreted it based on BS training the broken education system gave her. I disagree.
24
posted on
12/10/2006 4:07:52 PM PST
by
paulat
To: kingattax
Better register him as a sex offender and make sure he's not around schools or young kids.... no wait...
25
posted on
12/10/2006 4:08:22 PM PST
by
elfman2
(An army of amateurs doing the media's job.)
To: driftdiver
I think it is just a little kid needing a hug! He's 4!
26
posted on
12/10/2006 4:12:55 PM PST
by
the lastbestlady
(I now believe that we have two lives; the life we learn with and the life we live with after that.)
To: paulat
Wasn't "brushing." This wasn't a tiny, little 4-year-old. This was a kid performing a vulgarity he learned at home.The child wasn't 4? According to the article he was. And how do you know it was a "vulgarity" he was performing, instead of a hug where logistically his head may wind up nestled in her chest? Maybe you have more info than is provided in the article; that's all I'm going on.
27
posted on
12/10/2006 4:13:25 PM PST
by
KJC1
(Right when you think you're really good is when you need to pay the most attention)
To: kingattax; All
Are you sure it was a 4-year old and not this guy????
28
posted on
12/10/2006 4:18:23 PM PST
by
SandRat
(Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
To: the lastbestlady
I think it is just a little kid needing a hug! He's 4! It's one thing to get a "hug."
It's another thing if the kid was banging his face between her breasts.
That's the charge.
29
posted on
12/10/2006 4:22:59 PM PST
by
paulat
To: paulat
the kid is 4 years old perhaps he thought it was lunch time
30
posted on
12/10/2006 4:29:17 PM PST
by
al baby
(Hi mom)
To: kingattax
To: paulat
Maybe he's a weird kid. I don't think charges should be involved. (maybe he was breast fed too long, who knows?) It could be any number of reasons that he did what he did.
32
posted on
12/10/2006 4:31:10 PM PST
by
the lastbestlady
(I now believe that we have two lives; the life we learn with and the life we live with after that.)
To: the lastbestlady
Maybe he's a weird kid. I don't think charges should be involved. (maybe he was breast fed too long, who knows?) It could be any number of reasons that he did what he did. I agree.
33
posted on
12/10/2006 4:35:04 PM PST
by
paulat
To: paulat
Fine you disagree. Who is far more likely to be correct? Me, in that he was a 4 year old needing a hug. Or you that he was a 4 year old who was seeking to molest his teacher.
To: SandRat
Here's the culprit.
35
posted on
12/10/2006 5:14:02 PM PST
by
MaxMax
(God Bless America)
To: the lastbestlady
Note to the world: Breast-fed children tend to have VERY LITTLE INTEREST in breasts that do not produce milk.
36
posted on
12/10/2006 5:47:05 PM PST
by
LongElegantLegs
(...a urethral syringe used to treat syphilis with mercury.)
To: driftdiver
Fine you disagree. Who is far more likely to be correct? Me, in that he was a 4 year old needing a hug. Or you that he was a 4 year old who was seeking to molest his teacher. You are wrong on both counts.
It was a 4-year-old taught inappropriate behavior by his MTV-influenced family. The 4-year-old has been taught.
37
posted on
12/10/2006 5:55:11 PM PST
by
paulat
To: paulat
"It was a 4-year-old taught inappropriate behavior by his MTV-influenced family. The 4-year-old has been taught."
You must know this child. Because not only do you know what happened but you also know his family and their viewing habits.
Either that or you are jumping to conlusions and can't admit you might be wrong.
To: driftdiver
Either that or you are jumping to conlusions and can't admit you might be wrong. I would LOVE to be proven wrong! Prove it!
39
posted on
12/10/2006 6:03:59 PM PST
by
paulat
To: paulat
You see malice in the actions of a 4 yr old as the most likely course of action. Not sure I want to be bothered.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson