To: sionnsar
Can't we all just use Lotus Notes?
3 posted on
12/06/2006 7:17:59 AM PST by
jdm
To: Bush2000
4 posted on
12/06/2006 7:20:10 AM PST by
IncPen
(When Al Gore Finished the Internet, he invented Global Warming)
To: jdm
Can't we all just use Lotus Notes? There is always elm and vi
6 posted on
12/06/2006 7:23:35 AM PST by
Alouette
(Psalms of the Day: 77-78)
To: jdm
Can't we all just use Lotus Notes? Sigh. We switched back to MS Outlook after a couple of years with Notes... and IT *still* hasn't gotten my Outlook address book to work.
10 posted on
12/06/2006 7:34:59 AM PST by
sionnsar
(?trad-anglican.faithweb.com?|Iran Azadi| 5yst3m 0wn3d - it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY) | UN: Useless Nations)
To: jdm
You know, I still have an old disk drive that I took from an old machine that had a ton of Lotus Notes mail from my last job (the personal stuff that I kept and then transferred to my home machine), but I can't read it.
Actually, I never thought about checking if Outlook will import the stuff. (Note to self:)
TS
16 posted on
12/06/2006 8:18:47 AM PST by
Tanniker Smith
(I didn't know she was a liberal when I married her.)
To: jdm
The proper spelling is "Loathsome" not "Lotus." :-)
Can't we all just use Lotus Notes?
BTW, Loathsome Notes uses so much MS code it's generally vulnerable to the same things office products are.
28 posted on
12/06/2006 9:49:54 AM PST by
Salo
To: jdm
Can't we all just use Lotus Notes?Yeah, and we can all nail our testicles to a tree, but that doesn't mean any of us want to.
Well, technically, about half of us would have to nail something else to a tree, perhaps something else beginning with T, but in any case I think we'd rather pass.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson