Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: the OlLine Rebel
I think spending money on a living, breathing animal for its sake

The key words were are for ITS sake ... too often an animal has great amounts spent which are a salve to the emitions of or due to the selfishness of the owners, and not for the animal itself's sake.
126 posted on 12/07/2006 12:54:32 PM PST by AKA Elena (Oh Mary, conceived without sin, pray for us who have recourse to you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies ]


To: AKA Elena

So me spending hundreds every month on my allergic dog - who is still often "suffering" to an extent - is bad?

Personally, I don't quite buy that putting down a pet is always less selfish than spending effort and $$$ to keep it alive.

But that's just my view. I can also see the other. I just don't see any of it in absolutes. I don't really judge people harshly no matter what they do, anyway, even if I do now prefer the "effort" instead of the "euthanasia".


127 posted on 12/07/2006 12:59:05 PM PST by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson