To: the OlLine Rebel
I think spending money on a living, breathing animal for its sake
The key words were are for ITS sake ... too often an animal has great amounts spent which are a salve to the emitions of or due to the selfishness of the owners, and not for the animal itself's sake.
126 posted on
12/07/2006 12:54:32 PM PST by
AKA Elena
(Oh Mary, conceived without sin, pray for us who have recourse to you!)
To: AKA Elena
So me spending hundreds every month on my allergic dog - who is still often "suffering" to an extent - is bad?
Personally, I don't quite buy that putting down a pet is always less selfish than spending effort and $$$ to keep it alive.
But that's just my view. I can also see the other. I just don't see any of it in absolutes. I don't really judge people harshly no matter what they do, anyway, even if I do now prefer the "effort" instead of the "euthanasia".
127 posted on
12/07/2006 12:59:05 PM PST by
the OlLine Rebel
(Common sense is an uncommon virtue.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson