Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Toyota Camry Is Motor Trend Car of Year
AP ^ | 11/22/06 | TOM KRISHER

Posted on 11/22/2006 1:33:53 PM PST by kiriath_jearim

DETROIT -- The redesigned Toyota Camry, the hottest-selling car in America, is the winner of Motor Trend Magazine's 2007 Car of the Year award.

The award, announced Wednesday, went to all Camry variations, including the hybrid, because the car is innovative yet has a broad appeal, magazine Editor-in-Chief Angus MacKenzie said in a statement.

"The Camry is the one car rival automakers all wish they could build. It offers something for nearly everyone -- performance, efficiency and roominess -- at a price point most Americans can afford," MacKenzie said.

The Camry beat 26 other models that were totally new or redesigned in the year prior to Jan. 1, 2007, the magazine said. Japanese automakers had 10 cars in the field, with six U.S. models, five from Korea, four from Germany, one from the United Kingdom and one from Sweden.

MacKenzie said the Camry won in a very strong field.

"There have never been more choices available to American car buyers. That is a fact of life in the 21st century," he said.

Through October, Toyota sold 350,481 Camrys this year to lead all cars in U.S. sales. The No. 2 car in sales is Toyota's Corolla at 330,995, according to Autodata Corp.

Staffers at the magazine evaluated the vehicles on their innovation in engineering, design, safety and technology; their performance and quality; and whether the vehicle delivers value to the consumer.

This is the first year the Camry has won the award.

Among competitors for Car of the Year were the Chrysler Sebring, Saturn Aura, Nissan Altima, Kia Rondo, Honda Fit, Mercedes-Benz S Class, Volvo C70 T5 and the Volkswagen Rabbit.

Last year's winner was the Honda Civic. Last month, the magazine named the Mercedes-Benz GL450 its sport utility vehicle of the year.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsday.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: autoindustry; camry; cars; motortrend; toyota
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last
To: Alberta's Child
re the F150. Mine is a 1997, bought in March of 96 when the new style came out, and has 230,000 miles. Never fails to start, gets OK mileage for a truck (16-18), and although I would like a newer, more comfortable ride, just can't see paying the 40 large for a new F150 or a Tundra, which I love!

Sigh!

41 posted on 11/22/2006 5:06:02 PM PST by MoodyBlu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: sittnick

The Avalon is a pretty decent size inside, bordering on large. The Japanese mid-size cars are starting to border on large, at least to the point where my 6'3" frame finds them reasonably comfortable. But as you say, my standards were set with smaller vehicles. My last car was a Sentra. The cars you mention ARE large. Huge, even. I don't know why they don't still make cars as wide as the late 60s/early 70s American cars. The width is what really made those cars big, although to be sure they had plenty of room lengthwise, too, as a 25' long car should have :)

My Accord is actually just big enough for me, leg room wise. I'd like something even roomier, although I don't want to go much larger outside. The Ford 500 looks to be pretty roomy.


42 posted on 11/22/2006 5:22:02 PM PST by -YYZ-
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: CGTRWK
Designers at every auto company are facing nearly identical constraints. EPA requires this, DOT requires that, NHTSA requires the other

Beep, beep! We have a winner. This is the conundrum of modern automobile manufacturing. How do you please different bureucracies that have conflicting goals. An automobile has to have a certain amount of mass to be safe in a collision. It also needs a certain amount of weight to deal with certain road conditions safely. However, mass decreases fuel mileage. Mass also requires more energy and therefore leads tomore emissions.

So, what happens? The old station wagons that used to haul nine people went away. I suspect those rumble seats don't meet the new standards, and hey, you can't put two kids up front anyway, 'cause the airbag'll smoosh him (when is a safety featurE NOT a safety feature?) And who wants a car loaded with all those headrests and shoulder belts?

So, the family with kids in sports gets an SUV (kids and gear, also family vacations). Minivans fill in okay, but they are no good for hauling a boat or trailer. (Since the departure of the Astro Van and Ford Aerostar) People USED to be able to use full size sedans for these (pre FWD days). I know a number of large families that had to go up to a 12 passenger van to fit their family. Which of the governments goals were served by that? The only truly large vehicles are priced out of the range of budget-watching families. If I weren't in the rust belt, I think I'd pick up a full size Oldsmobile Custom Cruiser Wagon.
43 posted on 11/22/2006 6:16:57 PM PST by sittnick (There is no salvation in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist

Not only the Sonata, but the Ford Fusion has a big price advantage, as well... Around here, a well-equipped 4 cylinder Camry will run almost $21k new. A well-equipped Fusion goes for about $17k new.

And Consumer Reports has the Fusion rated as more reliable than the Camry and Accord

And you can get the Fusion with AWD, if that floats your boat (not available on the Camry)

The Camry is a fine vehicle, but there are many truly competitive vehicles out there available for less....


44 posted on 11/24/2006 10:49:02 AM PST by eraser2005
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim

Foo.

BUY AMERICAN


45 posted on 11/24/2006 10:50:38 AM PST by Cringing Negativism Network (Election 2006: For Republicans, the results were comprehensive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MoodyBlu

Well, if you want a truck for use as a truck (and not as a rolling style statement), you can still get a basic F-150 for under $20k.


46 posted on 11/24/2006 10:56:15 AM PST by eraser2005
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson