Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vista's EULA product activation worries
The Register ^ | 22 November 2006 | Mark Rasch

Posted on 11/22/2006 12:03:43 PM PST by ShadowAce

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last

1 posted on 11/22/2006 12:03:46 PM PST by ShadowAce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rdb3; chance33_98; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; Bush2000; PenguinWry; GodGunsandGuts; CyberCowboy777; ...

2 posted on 11/22/2006 12:04:17 PM PST by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

I downloaded the Beta and had nothing but troubles with Vista. I'm sticking with XP.


3 posted on 11/22/2006 12:06:10 PM PST by John Lenin (The most dangerous place for a child in America is indeed in its mother's womb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce
I guess the war against software piracy has made Microsoft the biggest pirate on the block.


4 posted on 11/22/2006 12:09:23 PM PST by darkwing104 (Let's get dangerous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Lenin

When I positively HAVE to run Windows, I run W2K. Otherwise, I run software that does not have such restrictive license terms.


5 posted on 11/22/2006 12:09:49 PM PST by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

First line of the EULA: We are Microsoft, resistance is futile.


6 posted on 11/22/2006 12:11:39 PM PST by Hydroshock ( (Proverbs 22:7). The rich ruleth over the poor, and the borrower is servant to the lender.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

The ACLU could not have said it better.


7 posted on 11/22/2006 12:11:52 PM PST by Jeff Gordon (History convinces me that bad government results from too much government. - Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce
Congratulations, Microsoft! You're creating greater and greater incentive for computer users to learn and use Linux. And they are.

Apparently, they don't have a course on "product hassle factor" at the schools where Microsoft's execs graduated.

I will advise all of my computer customers to avoid Vista.

8 posted on 11/22/2006 12:13:21 PM PST by TChris (We scoff at honor and are shocked to find traitors among us. - C.S. Lewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce
Some of these concerns are phony such as the "What if it phones home and the Internet is down...". I'm sure Microsoft will post a notice and give the user something like 14 days to re-validate someway.
9 posted on 11/22/2006 12:13:33 PM PST by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

Wow. Reading that was almost as boring as reading the license agreement itself.


10 posted on 11/22/2006 12:15:08 PM PST by VeniVidiVici (What's the one elected position Ted Kennedy has never held? Designated Driver.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VeniVidiVici

Not every important item is interesting to read about.


11 posted on 11/22/2006 12:16:47 PM PST by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce
Or, following the movie Happy Feet, you can decide to find software with a little penguin on it.

That's be all good and well if I didn't have a thousand dollars worth of software that won't run on Linux.
12 posted on 11/22/2006 12:21:58 PM PST by JamesP81 (If you have to ask permission from Uncle Sam, then it's not a right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnited

Yeah, because Microsoft cares so very much about their customers, right?

I decide I just must have Vista on my desktop for some reason, I'll probably just wait for a hacked and cracked copy of it to become available. Yes, pirated. Just as with XP, Microsoft's anti-piracy efforts actually encourage it in some circumstances. No, that's not some sort of rationalization for piracy, I'm just stating of fact of how I and many other people viewed this issue with XP, and will with Vista (if there's any way at all around MS's schemes).


13 posted on 11/22/2006 12:30:02 PM PST by -YYZ-
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce
The first, and more familiar, is that parties to a contract can generally agree to just about anything, as long as what they agree to doesn't violate the law and isn't "unconscionable".

There's also duress and if the contract is too one-sided. Now imagine a large organization with millions invested in a Microsoft software stack, and suddenly Microsoft makes it so you have to upgrade in order to remain compatible with something. Is acceptance of a license vs. millions of dollars spent to migrate to a non-Microsoft stack duress?

14 posted on 11/22/2006 12:48:40 PM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat
Is acceptance of a license vs. millions of dollars spent to migrate to a non-Microsoft stack duress?

I've always wondered about that. How can a court rationally find a corporation in violation of a license when the agreement seems to obviously be under duress?

15 posted on 11/22/2006 1:01:09 PM PST by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce
I have a 64bit CPU and installed Vista, the latest beta. No mouse drivers, my video drivers were not fully functional and had some problems running 32 bit programs. Installed Linux 64bit and had less problems. It looks exactly like XP, I will be in no rush to switch.
16 posted on 11/22/2006 1:05:12 PM PST by John Lenin (The most dangerous place for a child in America is indeed in its mother's womb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JamesP81
"That's be all good and well if I didn't have a thousand dollars worth of software that won't run on Linux."

Like what? There are ways to run MS software on Linux, in fact I can run the entire XP OS in a virtual machine on Linux if I wanted to.

Besides, when something goes wrong and you can't access your Windows crap, do you think MS is going care how much money you have tied up in software?

The replacements are FREE, install linux and OOo and move on leaving MS to sit in it's own excrement. :)

17 posted on 11/22/2006 1:11:09 PM PST by Shadow Deamon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

From the description, this EULA is just like XP. Activation is required. So whoopy-do-what.

When are ya'all going to get up in the crook of software companies when they offer you a shareware license, that disables itself after a period of time? Exactly what the article says Vista does.


18 posted on 11/22/2006 1:13:16 PM PST by RedWing9 (No tag here... Just want to stay vague...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

Sounds like Vista should be boycotted wholesale.

GRRRRRR


19 posted on 11/22/2006 1:22:24 PM PST by Quix (LET GOD ARISE AND HIS ENEMIES BE SCATTERED. LET ISRAEL CALL ON GOD AS THEIRS! & ISLAM FLUSH ITSELF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Quix

I know I'll never buy it--nor will I ever recommend it to family, friends, or clients.


20 posted on 11/22/2006 1:42:32 PM PST by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson