Skip to comments.
Vista's EULA product activation worries
The Register ^
| 22 November 2006
| Mark Rasch
Posted on 11/22/2006 12:03:43 PM PST by ShadowAce
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-58 next last
1
posted on
11/22/2006 12:03:46 PM PST
by
ShadowAce
To: rdb3; chance33_98; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; Bush2000; PenguinWry; GodGunsandGuts; CyberCowboy777; ...
2
posted on
11/22/2006 12:04:17 PM PST
by
ShadowAce
(Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
To: ShadowAce
I downloaded the Beta and had nothing but troubles with Vista. I'm sticking with XP.
3
posted on
11/22/2006 12:06:10 PM PST
by
John Lenin
(The most dangerous place for a child in America is indeed in its mother's womb)
To: ShadowAce
I guess the war against software piracy has made Microsoft the biggest pirate on the block.
4
posted on
11/22/2006 12:09:23 PM PST
by
darkwing104
(Let's get dangerous)
To: John Lenin
When I positively HAVE to run Windows, I run W2K. Otherwise, I run software that does not have such restrictive license terms.
5
posted on
11/22/2006 12:09:49 PM PST
by
ShadowAce
(Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
To: ShadowAce
First line of the EULA: We are Microsoft, resistance is futile.
6
posted on
11/22/2006 12:11:39 PM PST
by
Hydroshock
( (Proverbs 22:7). The rich ruleth over the poor, and the borrower is servant to the lender.)
To: ShadowAce
The ACLU could not have said it better.
7
posted on
11/22/2006 12:11:52 PM PST
by
Jeff Gordon
(History convinces me that bad government results from too much government. - Thomas Jefferson)
To: ShadowAce
Congratulations, Microsoft! You're creating greater and greater incentive for computer users to learn and use Linux. And they are.
Apparently, they don't have a course on "product hassle factor" at the schools where Microsoft's execs graduated.
I will advise all of my computer customers to avoid Vista.
8
posted on
11/22/2006 12:13:21 PM PST
by
TChris
(We scoff at honor and are shocked to find traitors among us. - C.S. Lewis)
To: ShadowAce
Some of these concerns are phony such as the "What if it phones home and the Internet is down...". I'm sure Microsoft will post a notice and give the user something like 14 days to re-validate someway.
To: ShadowAce
Wow. Reading that was almost as boring as reading the license agreement itself.
10
posted on
11/22/2006 12:15:08 PM PST
by
VeniVidiVici
(What's the one elected position Ted Kennedy has never held? Designated Driver.)
To: VeniVidiVici
Not every important item is interesting to read about.
11
posted on
11/22/2006 12:16:47 PM PST
by
ShadowAce
(Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
To: ShadowAce
Or, following the movie Happy Feet, you can decide to find software with a little penguin on it.
That's be all good and well if I didn't have a thousand dollars worth of software that won't run on Linux.
12
posted on
11/22/2006 12:21:58 PM PST
by
JamesP81
(If you have to ask permission from Uncle Sam, then it's not a right)
To: AmericaUnited
Yeah, because Microsoft cares so very much about their customers, right?
I decide I just must have Vista on my desktop for some reason, I'll probably just wait for a hacked and cracked copy of it to become available. Yes, pirated. Just as with XP, Microsoft's anti-piracy efforts actually encourage it in some circumstances. No, that's not some sort of rationalization for piracy, I'm just stating of fact of how I and many other people viewed this issue with XP, and will with Vista (if there's any way at all around MS's schemes).
13
posted on
11/22/2006 12:30:02 PM PST
by
-YYZ-
To: ShadowAce
The first, and more familiar, is that parties to a contract can generally agree to just about anything, as long as what they agree to doesn't violate the law and isn't "unconscionable". There's also duress and if the contract is too one-sided. Now imagine a large organization with millions invested in a Microsoft software stack, and suddenly Microsoft makes it so you have to upgrade in order to remain compatible with something. Is acceptance of a license vs. millions of dollars spent to migrate to a non-Microsoft stack duress?
To: antiRepublicrat
Is acceptance of a license vs. millions of dollars spent to migrate to a non-Microsoft stack duress? I've always wondered about that. How can a court rationally find a corporation in violation of a license when the agreement seems to obviously be under duress?
15
posted on
11/22/2006 1:01:09 PM PST
by
ShadowAce
(Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
To: ShadowAce
I have a 64bit CPU and installed Vista, the latest beta. No mouse drivers, my video drivers were not fully functional and had some problems running 32 bit programs. Installed Linux 64bit and had less problems. It looks exactly like XP, I will be in no rush to switch.
16
posted on
11/22/2006 1:05:12 PM PST
by
John Lenin
(The most dangerous place for a child in America is indeed in its mother's womb)
To: JamesP81
"That's be all good and well if I didn't have a thousand dollars worth of software that won't run on Linux."
Like what? There are ways to run MS software on Linux, in fact I can run the entire XP OS in a virtual machine on Linux if I wanted to.
Besides, when something goes wrong and you can't access your Windows crap, do you think MS is going care how much money you have tied up in software?
The replacements are FREE, install linux and OOo and move on leaving MS to sit in it's own excrement. :)
To: ShadowAce
From the description, this EULA is just like XP. Activation is required. So whoopy-do-what.
When are ya'all going to get up in the crook of software companies when they offer you a shareware license, that disables itself after a period of time? Exactly what the article says Vista does.
18
posted on
11/22/2006 1:13:16 PM PST
by
RedWing9
(No tag here... Just want to stay vague...)
To: ShadowAce
Sounds like Vista should be boycotted wholesale.
GRRRRRR
19
posted on
11/22/2006 1:22:24 PM PST
by
Quix
(LET GOD ARISE AND HIS ENEMIES BE SCATTERED. LET ISRAEL CALL ON GOD AS THEIRS! & ISLAM FLUSH ITSELF)
To: Quix
I know I'll never buy it--nor will I ever recommend it to family, friends, or clients.
20
posted on
11/22/2006 1:42:32 PM PST
by
ShadowAce
(Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-58 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson