Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: webstersII

I am attempting to not judge beyond the facts available - I said it is possible that someone other than old lady did something to merit a search of the house and I don't see how, given current info that one can argue that is not a possibility.


47 posted on 11/22/2006 6:21:02 AM PST by gondramB (It wasn't raining when Noah built the ark.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: gondramB

I'm with you on that. We don't know a lot of stuff. I am willing to discuss suspicions, but anybody that thinks they have the answer to this at this point is just not firing on all cylinders.

I have an opinion, but it is based on such scant evidence that it could change at the drop of a hat.


67 posted on 11/22/2006 6:52:12 AM PST by RobRoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

To: gondramB

"I am attempting to not judge beyond the facts available"

As it turns out, you are correct.

The early reports said that it was based on a tip, which can be notoriously unreliable. But it wasn't a tip that sent them there, undercover officers did a buy at the house earlier in the day.

Now that we know the undercover guys went in the house earlier, that begs a whole other set of questions about the way they approached the raid.


82 posted on 11/22/2006 10:14:17 AM PST by webstersII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson