may i suggest you look up the article in Army Lawyer, written by the Judge Advocate General, a serving Major General of the US Army, in 1999?
in that article,the General states that CPT Wurtz:
1. was tried by a tribunal, which had NO authority to try a civilian,
2. KNOWINGLY refused to allow him to call witnesses in his defense,
3.ALLOWED the subornation of perjury to be admitted to evidence, which was KNOWN to be FALSE before the trial opened,
4.UNLAWFULLY convicted him &
5. sentenced him to hang.
it was NOT either a FAIR trial NOR did CPT Wurtz commit ANY of the crimes for which he was hanged! NONE of them.
free dixie,sw