Replies

btw,it's always FUNNY to me that NOBODY on your side can find my books/sources WHEN those sources make the DYs look cruel,dishonest, stupid, filled with HATE and/or IGNORANT. otoh, they CAN find those SAME sources to "prove" that "you (addressing me) don't know what you're talking about". (that problem is called WILLFUL IGNORANCE & INTELLECTUAL DISHONESTY!)

No, that problem is called "you lying or at least misstating what a source says, then being confronted with the truth."

one of my "all-time favorites" of that sort of DISHONESTY was the former member-in-goodstanding of the coven, who stated that here was NO BOOK titled YACHTS AGAINST SUBS, but DID post excerpts from TWO reviews of THE BOOK. (it's REALLY hard for a book reviewer to review something that never was written, don't you think??)

I don't supppose you can present any of this, either, can you? I didn't think so. "Yachts Against Subs" doesn't exist as a book. End of story. You just look desperate or delusional claiming that it does.

i further note that you didn't bother to say whether YOU are ignorant enough to believe that "The OR" is "a racist diatribe" and/or "rebel propaganda"

Again, show me what someone actually said and I'll comment on it. I won't comment on what you tell me some other poster said, given your track record with the truth.

Now, answer the question that I notice you avoided in that whole diatribe: When Anderson, Doubleday, and Foster, all US Army officers at Sumter, reported that the garrison was running out of supplies and were at half rations, picking bits of rice out of broken glass, were they lying?