Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Shame of the Yankees - America's Worst Anti-Jewish Action [Civil War thread]
Jewish Press ^ | 11-21-06 | Lewis Regenstein

Posted on 11/21/2006 5:23:06 AM PST by SJackson

Shame of the Yankees - America's Worst Anti-Jewish Action

By: Lewis Regenstein
Wednesday, November 15, 2006

This year, the second day of Chanukah will coincide with the 144th anniversary of the worst official act of anti-Semitism in American history.

On December 17, 1862, in the midst of the Civil War, Union general Ulysses S. Grant issued his infamous "General Order # 11," expelling all Jews "as a class" from his conquered territories within 24 hours. Henry Halleck, the Union general-in-chief, wired Grant in support of his action, saying that neither he nor President Lincoln were opposed "to your expelling traitors and Jew peddlers."

A few months earlier, on August 11, General William Tecumseh Sherman had warned in a letter to the adjutant general of the Union Army that "the country will swarm with dishonest Jews" if continued trade in cotton were encouraged. And Grant also issued orders in November 1862 banning travel in general, by "the Israelites especially," because they were "such an intolerable nuisance," and railroad conductors were told that "no Jews are to be permitted to travel on the railroad."

As a result of Grant's expulsion order, Jewish families were forced out of their homes in Paducah, Kentucky, and Holly Springs and Oxford, Mississippi – and a few were sent to prison. When some Jewish victims protested to President Lincoln, Attorney General Edward Bates advised the president that he was indifferent to such objections.

Lincoln rescinded Grant's odious order, but not before Jewish families in the area had been humiliated, terrified, and jailed, and some stripped of their possessions.

Captain Philip Trounstine of the Ohio Volunteer Cavalry, being unable in good conscience to round up and expel his fellow Jews, resigned his army commission, saying he could "no longer bear the taunts and malice of his fellow officers brought on by that order."

The officials responsible for the United States government's most vicious anti-Jewish actions ever were never dismissed, admonished or, apparently, even officially criticized for the religious persecution they inflicted on innocent citizens.

Northern Animus, Southern Hospitality

The exact reason for Grant's decree remains uncertain. As author and military historian Mel Young points out in his book Where They Lie, Grant's own family was involved in cotton speculation (as well as owning slaves), so perhaps he considered Jewish traders to be competition. And the language spoken by the many Dutch and German-speaking peddlers and merchants in the area was probably confused with Yiddish and many were mistakenly taken to be Jewish.

But most likely the underlying reason for the order was the prejudice against and hatred of Jews so widely felt among the Union forces.

Such bigotry is described in detail by Robert Rosen in his authoritative work The Jewish Confederates; by Bertram Korn in his classic American Jewry and the Civil War; and by other historians of the era. They recount how Jews in Union-occupied areas, such as New Orleans and Memphis, were singled out by Union forces for vicious abuse and vilification.

In New Orleans, the ruling general, Benjamin "Beast" Butler, harshly vilifiedJews and was quoted by a Jewish newspaper as saying he could "suck the blood of every Jew, and will detain every Jew as long as he can." An Associated Press reporter from the North wrote that "The Jews in New Orleans and all the South ought to be exterminated. They run the blockade, and are always to be found at the bottom of every new villainy."

Of Memphis, whose Mississippi River port was a center of illegal cotton trading, the Chicago Tribune reported in July 1862: "The Israelites have come down upon the city like locusts. Every boat brings in a load of the hooked-nose fraternity."

Rosen writes at length about the blatant and widespread anti-Semitism throughout the North, with even The New York Times castigating the anti-war Democratic Party for having a chairman who was "the agent of foreign Jew bankers."

New Englanders were especially hateful, and one leading abolitionist minister, Theodore Parker, called Jews "lecherous," and said that their intellects were "sadly pinched in those narrow foreheads" and that they "did sometimes kill a Christian baby at the Passover."

Meanwhile, in the South, Jews were playing a prominent role in the Confederate government and armed forces, and "were used to being treated as equals," as Rosen puts it, an acceptance they had enjoyed for a century and a half.

Dale and Theodore Rosengarten, in A Portion of the People: Three Hundred Years of Southern Jewish Life, observe that in 1800 Charleston had more Jews than any city in North America, and many were respected citizens, office holders, and successful entrepreneurs. Some referred to the city as "our Jerusalem" and Myer Moses, my maternal family patriarch, in 1806 called his hometown "this land of milk and honey." And so it seemed.

Some 3,000 or more Jews fought for the South, practically every male of military age. Many carried with them to the front the famous soldiers' prayer written by Richmond rabbi Max Michelbacher, who after secession had issued a widely-published benediction comparing Southerners to "the Children of Israel crossing the Red Sea."

Many Jewish Confederates distinguished themselves by showing, along with their Christian comrades, amazing courage, dedication and valor, and enduring incredible hardships against overwhelming and often hopeless odds.

The Confederacy's secretary of war (he would later become secretary of state) was Judah P. Benjamin, and the top Confederate commander, General Robert E. Lee, was renowned for making every effort to accommodate his Jewish soldiers on their holidays.

Some find it peculiar that a people once held in slavery by the Egyptians, and who celebrate their liberation every year at Passover, would fight for a nation dedicated to maintaining that institution. But while slavery is usually emphasized, falsely, as the cause of the war, Confederate soldiers felt they were fighting for their homeland and their families, against an invading army that was trying, with great success, to kill them and their comrades, burn their homes, and destroy their cities.

Anyone with family who fought to defend the South, as over two dozen members of my extended family did, cannot help but appreciate the dire circumstances our ancestors encountered.

The Moses Family

Near the end of the War Between the States, as I grew up hearing it called, my great grandfather, Andrew Jackson Moses, participated in a dangerous mission as hopeless as it was valiant. The date was April 9, 1865, the same day Lee surrendered to Grant at Appomattox. Having run away from school at 16 to become a Confederate scout, Jack rode out as part of a hastily formed local militia to defend his hometown of Sumter, South Carolina.

Approaching rapidly were the 2,700 men of Potter's Raiders, a unit attached to Sherman's army that had just burned Columbia and most everything else in its path, and Sumter expected similar treatment.

Along wih a few other teenagers, old men, invalids, and wounded from the local hospital, Sumter's 158 ragtag defenders were able to hold off Potter's battle-seasoned veterans for over an hour and a half at the cost of a dozen lives.

Jack got away with a price on his head, and Sumter was not burned after all. But some buildings were, and there are documented instances of murder, rape, and arson by the Yankees, including the torching of our family's 196 bales of cotton.

Meanwhile, on that same day, Jack's eldest brother, Lt. Joshua Lazarus Moses, who'd been wounded in the war's first real battle, First Manassas (Bull Run), was defending Mobile in the last infantry battle of the war. With his forces outnumbered 12 to one, Josh was commanding an artillery battalion that, before being overrun, fired the last shots in defense of Mobile.

Refusing to lay down his arms, he was killed in a battle at Fort Blakely a few hours after Lee, unbeknownst to them, had surrendered. In that battle, one of Josh's brothers, Perry, was wounded, and another brother, Horace, was captured while laying land mines.

The fifth brother, Isaac Harby Moses, having served with distinction in combat in the legendary Wade Hampton's cavalry, rode home from North Carolina after the Battle of Bentonville, the last major battle of the war, where he had commanded his company after all the officers had been killed or wounded. His mother proudly observed in her memoirs that he never surrendered to the enemy forces.

He was among those who fired the first shots of the war when his company of Citadel cadets opened up on the Union ship, Star of the West, which was attempting to resupply the besieged Fort Sumter in January 1861, three months before the war officially began.

Last Order Of The Lost Cause

The Moses brothers' uncle, Major Raphael J. Moses, from Columbus, Georgia, is credited with being the father of Georgia's peach industry. He was General James Longstreet's chief commissary officer and was responsible for supplying and feeding up to 50,000 men (including porters and other non-combatants).

Their commander, Robert E. Lee, had forbidden Moses from entering private homes in search of supplies during raids into Union territory, even when food and other provisions were in painfully short supply. And he always paid for what he took from farms and businesses, albeit in Confederate tender – often enduring, in good humor, harsh verbal abuse from the local women.

Interestingly, Moses ended up attending the last meeting and carrying out the last order of the Confederate government, which was to deliver the remnant of the Confederate treasury ($40,000 in gold and silver bullion) to help feed, supply and provide medical help to the defeated Confederate soldiers in hospitals and straggling home after the war – weary, hungry, often sick or wounded, shoeless, and in tattered uniforms. With the help of a small group of determined armed guards, he successfully carried out the order from President Jefferson Davis, despite repeated attempts by mobs to forcibly take the bullion.

Major Moses's three sons also served the Confederacy. One of them, Albert Moses Luria, was killed in 1862 at age 19 after courageously throwing a live Union artillery shell out of his fortification before it exploded, thereby saving the lives of many of his compatriots. He was the first Jewish Confederate killed in the war; his cousin Josh, killed at Mobile, the last.

Moses had always been intensely proud of his Jewish heritage, having named one son Luria after an ancestor who was court physician to Spain's Queen Isabella. Another son he named Nunez, after Dr. Samuel Nunez, the court physician in Lisbon who fled religious persecution in Portugal and arrived from England in July 1733 with some 41 other Jews on a tiny, storm-tossed ship. As one of the first Jews in Georgia, Nunez is credited with having saved the colony in Savannah from perishing from malaria or some ther kind of tropical fever.

After the war, Raphael Moses was elected to the Georgia House of Representatives and named chairman of the Judiciary Committee. One of his best known writings, reproduced countless times in books and articles, is a lengthy, open letter he wrote in 1878 to a political opponent who'd attacked him for being "a Jew."

This was a rare deviation from the general acceptance the South showed toward its Jews, and Moses hit back hard.

"Had your overburdened heart sought relief in some exhibition of unmeasured gratitude, had you a wealth of gifts and selected from your abundance your richest offering to lay at my feet," he wrote, "you could not have honored me more highly, nor distinguished me more gratefully than by proclaiming me a Jew."

One cannot help but respect the dignity and gentlemanly policies of Lee and Moses, and the courage of the greatly outnumbered, out-supplied but rarely outfought Confederate soldiers.

In stark contrast and in violation of the then-prevailing rules of warfare, the troops of Union generals Grant, Sherman, and Sheridan burned and looted homes, farms, courthouses, libraries, businesses, and entire cities full of defenseless civilians (including my hometown of Atlanta) as part of official Union policy not simply to defeat but to utterly destroy the South.

And before, during, and after the war, this Union army (led by many of the same generals, including Grant, Sherman, Sheridan, and Custer) used the same and even worse tactics to massacre Native Americans in what we euphemistically call the Indian Wars. It would be more accurate to call it mass murder – a virtual genocide – of Native Americans, including helpless old men, women, and children in their villages.

Why We Revere Our Ancestors

The valor of the Jewish Confederates and the other Southern soldiers and the blatant anti-Semitism so prevalent in the North form a nearly forgotten chapter of American history. It is, seemingly, an embarrassment to many Jewish historians – and hardly politically correct – in this day of constantly reiterated demonization of the Confederacy and worshipful reverence for Lincoln and his brutal generals.

But the anniversary of Grant's little-remembered Nazi-like decree and his other atrocities should serve to remind us what the Southern soldiers and civilians were up against. Perhaps it will help people understand why native Southerners, including many Jewish families, revere their ancestors' courage and, despite the controversy it causes in certain "enlightened" circles, still take much pride in this heritage.

Lewis Regenstein, a native Atlantan, is a writer and author. He can be reached at  Regenstein@mindspring.com.


TOPICS: History
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 901-920921-940941-960 ... 1,061-1,068 next last
To: TexConfederate1861
Buchanan chose not to challenge the Confederacy.

But he made it clear that he believed their actions to be illegal.

And whether or not Lincoln thought the actions illegal isn't the point, so much as the Confederacy wanted peace, and to be left ALONE.

Then they had an odd way of showing it when they bombarded Sumter.

921 posted on 12/03/2006 4:46:22 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 916 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur; TexConfederate1861
Lets quit beating around the bush. Davis chose war for one reason -- he had to. The Upper South states had rejected secession and the so-called Confederacy of the Cotton States had no chance of viability unless they got the more populus and wealthy southern states, especially Virginia, to join them and the only way to accomplish that was to start a war before people realized how rediculus that little combination of plantations called the Confederate states were.

They had to accomplish that before passions cooled and people realized that the Slave Power couldn't even deliver the mail let alone be a true republic.

922 posted on 12/03/2006 6:26:44 AM PST by Ditto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 921 | View Replies]

To: Colonel Kangaroo
what UTTER NONSENSE!

you and your cohorts, that are the clueLESS & brainwashed remainder of the "DAMNyankee coven of lunatics, fools, bigots, nitwits & at least ONE outright racist", just don't/can't accept that your "clay-footed, secular saint: abe, the UNjust" was fighting for raw power, $$$$$$$$ & his EGO-mania. (the TYRANT would have happily killed EVERYBODY in the country,for more POLITICAL POWER & his EGO!)

our dixie ancestors wanted PRECISELY the same thing that their grandfathers of 1776 wanted: FREEDOM & LIBERTY. despite what you've been "snowed with", the war was ONLY about FREEDOM for DIXIE (if you were a southerner) and about "preserving the union of the UNWILLING" (if you were a yank).

a century & a half of SELF-righteous LIES & DAMNyankee apologist NONSENSE do NOT change those simple FACTS!

free dixie,sw

923 posted on 12/03/2006 9:00:21 AM PST by stand watie ("Resistance to tyrants is OBEDIENCE to God." - T. Jefferson, 1804)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 919 | View Replies]

To: Ditto
actually, the election of the TYRANT made secession of the upper south (and perhaps the war) inevitable.

the TRUTH is that even before he was sworn in as a minority president, lincoln was seen to be exactly what he was: a party hack, a crooked railroad lawyer & a power-hungry lunatic, who desired war with the new dixie republic, rather than to let the south ALONE and the USA remain at PEACE.

the UNvarnished TRUTH is that that it was lincoln's war & the blame for a MILLION DEAD is upon his head.

free dixie,sw

924 posted on 12/03/2006 9:06:17 AM PST by stand watie ("Resistance to tyrants is OBEDIENCE to God." - T. Jefferson, 1804)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 922 | View Replies]

To: stand watie
actually, the election of the TYRANT made secession of the upper south (and perhaps the war) inevitable.

Ignoring facts as usual. All eight of the Upper South and the Border States rejected secession the first time around even when the Cotton states begged them. Once Davis started his war, the passions drove four of them them to do something totally stupid for which they paid a far higher price than the Cotton despots of the deep south who started the whole mess.

925 posted on 12/03/2006 9:22:40 AM PST by Ditto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 924 | View Replies]

To: stand watie
actually, the election of the TYRANT made secession of the upper south (and perhaps the war) inevitable

Yeah there is nothing the South hated worse than the Constitutional process at work.

926 posted on 12/03/2006 9:26:30 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 924 | View Replies]

To: stand watie
Brothers (and sisters if you're here). This is what the Civil War wrought on the individuals in this nation a century and a half ago:

Casualties in the Civil War

At least 618,000 Americans died in the Civil War, and some experts say the toll reached 700,000. The number that is most often quoted is 620,000. At any rate, these casualties exceed the nation's loss in all its other wars, from the Revolution through Vietnam. The Union armies had from 2,500,000 to 2,750,000 men. Their losses, by the best estimates:

Battle deaths: 110,070

Disease, etc.: 250,152

Total 360,222

The Confederate strength, known less accurately because of missing records, was from 750,000 to 1,250,000. Its estimated losses:

Battle deaths: 94,000

Disease, etc.: 164,000

Total 258,000

The leading authority on casualties of the war, Thomas L. Livermore, admitting the handicap of poor records in some cases, studied 48 of the war's battles and concluded:

Of every 1,000 Federals in battle, 112 were wounded.

Of every 1,000 Confederates, 150 were hit.

Mortality was greater among Confederate wounded, because of inferior medical service. The great battles, in terms of their toll in dead, wounded, and missing is listed on this site:

http://www.civilwarhome.com/Battles.htm

I've bitched, pissed, wailed and moaned about the cost of that war. Is anyone even remotely with me on that?
927 posted on 12/03/2006 7:20:58 PM PST by spacecowboynj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 912 | View Replies]

To: spacecowboynj
actually the number DEAD, as a direct/indirect result of the NEEDLESS & IMMORAL war against the FREEDOM of the new dixie republic, was about ONE MILLION. 700 thousand of those were as a direct result of the war. the rest were NON-combatants, who succumbed to an early death, as a result of other war-related causes.

the fault for that great hecatomb in America is that of lincoln, the TYRANT.

free dixie,sw

928 posted on 12/03/2006 7:28:13 PM PST by stand watie ("Resistance to tyrants is OBEDIENCE to God." - T. Jefferson, 1804)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 927 | View Replies]

To: spacecowboynj
btw, one wonders how many MILLION countrymen wee willie klintoon AND some of the members of FR's "DAMNyankee coven" would have killed to prevent the south's secession, had it been in @2000 instead of the 1860s???

ONE of the "DY coven" members said not long ago on another thread,when i asked him how many MILLION Americans he would WILLINGLY KILL to keep the south subservient & in the union, if he was POTUS. his answer was ALL of us! i suspect but do not know that lincolbn's answer would have been exactly the SAME!

lincoln & klintoon are twins, separated by a century & a half. NEITHER had the morals of an alley-cat. BOTH would do/say ANYTHING for their own POWER & for the LUST for $$$$$. ANYTHING!

free dixie,sw

929 posted on 12/03/2006 7:35:49 PM PST by stand watie ("Resistance to tyrants is OBEDIENCE to God." - T. Jefferson, 1804)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 927 | View Replies]

To: spacecowboynj
btw, one wonders how many MILLION countrymen wee willie klintoon AND some of the members of FR's "DAMNyankee coven" would have killed to prevent the south's secession, had it been in @2000 instead of the 1860s???

ONE of the "DY coven" members said not long ago on another thread,when i asked him how many MILLION Americans he would WILLINGLY KILL to keep the south subservient & in the union, if he was POTUS. his answer was ALL of us! i suspect but do not know that lincoln's answer would have been exactly the SAME!

lincoln & klintoon are twins, separated by a century & a half. NEITHER had the morals of an alley-cat. BOTH would do/say ANYTHING for their own POWER & for the LUST for $$$$$. ANYTHING!

free dixie,sw

930 posted on 12/03/2006 7:36:38 PM PST by stand watie ("Resistance to tyrants is OBEDIENCE to God." - T. Jefferson, 1804)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 927 | View Replies]

To: stand watie

the south would've never seceded in the first place were it not under great pressure to do so. and i don't mean slavery. this was so beyond that. men like Jefferson Davis, Lee, Jackson et al did not do this because they were some slave-mongering "masters" - this had to do with money. Same as most every other war.


931 posted on 12/03/2006 7:42:40 PM PST by spacecowboynj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 930 | View Replies]

To: Colonel Kangaroo

I really doubt it. And remember, Lincoln could have cared less about the slaves, so that is not even an issue in this discussion.


932 posted on 12/03/2006 8:47:44 PM PST by TexConfederate1861 ("Having a picture of John Wayne doesn't make you a Texan :) ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 919 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

Yes, but I imagine that the Confederate Government would have given them a clear answer, rather than playing games with them as the Lincoln Cabinet did.


933 posted on 12/03/2006 8:49:46 PM PST by TexConfederate1861 ("Having a picture of John Wayne doesn't make you a Texan :) ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 920 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

Since a Warship with soldiers was being sent to re-supply and
reinforce a fort in the middle of a busy port, what other choice would they have. None.


934 posted on 12/03/2006 8:52:19 PM PST by TexConfederate1861 ("Having a picture of John Wayne doesn't make you a Texan :) ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 921 | View Replies]

To: Ditto

That is a doubtful hypothesis. The other states would have joined regardless.


935 posted on 12/03/2006 8:53:21 PM PST by TexConfederate1861 ("Having a picture of John Wayne doesn't make you a Texan :) ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 922 | View Replies]

To: Ditto

By the way, the Confederate Postmaster, Texan, John H. Reagan, performed his job well, and got a viable postal service up and running in a short period of time.


936 posted on 12/03/2006 8:54:54 PM PST by TexConfederate1861 ("Having a picture of John Wayne doesn't make you a Texan :) ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 922 | View Replies]

To: TexConfederate1861
Yes, but I imagine that the Confederate Government would have given them a clear answer, rather than playing games with them as the Lincoln Cabinet did.

Of course you would imagine that, you would imagine anything that would put the confederacy in a positive light. The fact of the matter is that there was no serious offer to negotiate anything, there was no desire for a peaceful solution of anything except complete and total acceptance of the validity of the southern rebellion.

937 posted on 12/04/2006 3:37:47 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 933 | View Replies]

To: TexConfederate1861
Since a Warship with soldiers was being sent to re-supply and reinforce a fort in the middle of a busy port, what other choice would they have. None.

The ships were there to resupply only, and would not have landed troops or munitions unless the resupply was opposed. As Lincoln made clear in his message to Governor Pickens.

938 posted on 12/04/2006 3:39:08 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 934 | View Replies]

To: TexConfederate1861
By the way, the Confederate Postmaster, Texan, John H. Reagan, performed his job well, and got a viable postal service up and running in a short period of time.

Not a difficult job when the territory you were responsible for shrank by the day. And the rates were considerably higher, too.

939 posted on 12/04/2006 3:50:23 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 936 | View Replies]

To: spacecowboynj
I've bitched, pissed, wailed and moaned about the cost of that war. Is anyone even remotely with me on that?

Had the south won it's rebellion would you still be bitching and pissing and whailing and moaning?

940 posted on 12/04/2006 3:52:09 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 927 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 901-920921-940941-960 ... 1,061-1,068 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson