To: MadIvan
I agree with you. I seriously doubt that anything with The Silmarillion will be worth watching on a full screen without Jackson at the helm.
8 posted on
11/20/2006 11:44:57 PM PST by
Talking_Mouse
(wahhabi delenda est)
To: Talking_Mouse
Actually, I think the movies could have been done differently. While Gollum was the great "creation" of the movies, I thought that whole huge sections of meaning were lost in the films translation from the books. It was a strongly Catholic work and much of that got left out.
16 posted on
11/21/2006 12:27:20 AM PST by
glorgau
To: Talking_Mouse
I seriously doubt that anything with The Silmarillion will be worth watching on a full screen without Jackson at the helm. The Silmarillion will be hard to translate to the screen, big or small, period. It's a collection of individual stories with an overall plot/theme to them. It would have to be done as some form of serial to do any justice to them, otherwise, it would wind up being a massive re-write of the source material.
48 posted on
11/21/2006 5:22:09 AM PST by
kevkrom
(John F'n Kerry's 'apology': "I'm sorry you were too stupid to realize I wasn't calling you stupid.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson