SCO's claims of infringement weren't ever substantiated by senior counsel at the Free Software Foundation that I recall. Please show they were, or that I ever claimed they were, or retract your bogus claim.
What bogus claim? When the SCO suit started you were howling that "even the FSF admitted that Linux infringed on patents." You've been harping on that point ever since.
No one has ever substantiated it because it's never been proven true. Now you're claiming it all over again--again without any proof. Ballmer's pulling a McBride by throwing a vague reference to Linux infringing on some IP that is never referenced. Think this claim has any more credibility than SCO's? I don't.